 |
|
Psychosocial Disability in the Course of Bipolar I and II Disorders
A Prospective, Comparative, Longitudinal Study
Lewis L. Judd, MD;
Hagop S. Akiskal, MD;
Pamela J. Schettler, PhD;
Jean Endicott, PhD;
Andrew C. Leon, PhD;
David A. Solomon, MD;
William Coryell, MD;
Jack D. Maser, PhD;
Martin B. Keller, MD
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62:1322-1330.
Context Evidence of psychosocial disability in bipolar disorder is based primarily on bipolar I disorder (BP-I) and does not relate disability to affective symptom severity and polarity or to bipolar II disorder (BP-II).
Objective To provide detailed data on psychosocial disability in relation to symptom status during the long-term course of BP-I and BP-II.
Design A naturalistic study with 20 years of prospective, systematic follow-up.
Setting Inpatient and outpatient treatment facilities at 5 US academic centers.
Patients One hundred fifty-eight patients with BP-I and 133 patients with BP-II who were followed up for a mean (SD) of 15 (4.8) years in the National Institute of Mental Health Collaborative Depression Study.
Main Outcome Measures The relationship, by random regression, between Range of Impaired Functioning Tool psychosocial impairment scores and affective symptom status in 1-month periods during the long-term course of illness from 6-month and yearly Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Evaluation interviews.
Results Psychosocial impairment increases significantly with each increment in depressive symptom severity for BP-I and BP-II and with most increments in manic symptom severity for BP-I. Subsyndromal hypomanic symptoms are not disabling in BP-II, and they may even enhance functioning. Depressive symptoms are at least as disabling as manic or hypomanic symptoms at corresponding severity levels and, in some cases, significantly more so. At each level of depressive symptom severity, BP-I and BP-II are equally impairing. When asymptomatic, patients with bipolar disorder have good psychosocial functioning, although it is not as good as that of well controls.
Conclusions Psychosocial disability fluctuates in parallel with changes in affective symptom severity in BP-I and BP-II. Important findings for clinical management are the following: (1) depressive episodes and symptoms, which dominate the course of BP-I and BP-II, are equal to or more disabling than corresponding levels of manic or hypomanic symptoms; (2) subsyndromal depressive symptoms, but not subsyndromal manic or hypomanic symptoms, are associated with significant impairment; and (3) subsyndromal hypomanic symptoms appear to enhance functioning in BP-II.
Author Affiliations: Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego (Drs Judd, Akiskal, Schettler, and Maser); Department of Research Assessment and Training, Columbia University, New York, NY (Dr Endicott); Department of Psychiatry, Cornell University, New York (Dr Leon); Department of Psychiatry, Brown University, Providence, RI (Drs Solomon and Keller); and Department of Psychiatry, University of Iowa, Iowa City (Dr Coryell).
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Comparing Genes and Phenomenology in the Major Psychoses: Schizophrenia and Bipolar 1 Disorder
Ivleva et al.
Schizophr Bull 2008;34:734-742.
FULL TEXT
Risk of Recurrence in Women With Bipolar Disorder During Pregnancy: Prospective Study of Mood Stabilizer Discontinuation
Viguera et al.
Am. J. Psychiatry 2007;164:1817-1824.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Patterns of Psychotropic Drug Prescription for U.S. Patients With Diagnoses of Bipolar Disorders
Baldessarini et al.
Psychiatr. Serv. 2007;58:85-91.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Would You Rather Be Hypomanic or Depressed?
JWatch Psychiatry 2006;2006:6-6.
FULL TEXT
|
