You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 63 No. 5, May 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (16)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Bipolar Disorder
 •Mood Disorders
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Long-term Effectiveness and Cost of a Systematic Care Program for Bipolar Disorder

Gregory E. Simon, MD, MPH; Evette J. Ludman, PhD; Mark S. Bauer, MD; Jürgen Unützer, MD, MPH; Belinda Operskalski, MPH

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006;63:500-508.

Context  Despite the availability of efficacious treatments, the long-term course of bipolar disorder is often unfavorable.

Objective  To test the effectiveness of a multicomponent intervention program to improve the quality of care and long-term outcomes for persons with bipolar disorder.

Design  Randomized controlled trial with allocation concealment and blinded outcome assessment.

Setting  Mental health clinics of a group-model prepaid health plan.

Patients  Of 785 patients in treatment for bipolar disorder who were invited to participate, 509 attended an evaluation appointment, 450 were found eligible to participate, and 441 enrolled in the trial.

Interventions  Participants were randomly assigned to a multicomponent intervention program or to continued care as usual. Three nurse care managers provided a 2-year systematic intervention program, including the following: a structured group psychoeducational program, monthly telephone monitoring of mood symptoms and medication adherence, feedback to treating mental health providers, facilitation of appropriate follow-up care, and as-needed outreach and crisis intervention.

Main Outcome Measures  In-person blinded research interviews every 3 months assessed mood symptoms using the Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Examination. Health plan administrative records were used to assess the use and cost of mental health services.

Results  Intent-to-treat analyses demonstrated that the intervention significantly reduced the mean level of mania symptoms (z = 2.09, P = .04) and the time with significant mania symptoms (19.2 vs 24.7 weeks; F1 = 6.0, P = .01). There was no significant intervention effect on mean level of depressive symptoms (z = 0.19, P = .85) or time with significant depressive symptoms (47.6 vs 50.7 weeks; F1 = 0.56, P = .45). Benefits of the intervention were found only in a subgroup of 343 persons with clinically significant mood symptoms at the baseline assessment. The incremental cost (adjusted) of the intervention was $1251 (95% confidence interval, $55-$2446), including approximately $800 for the intervention program services and an approximate $500 increase in the costs of other mental health services.

Conclusions  Population-based systematic care programs can significantly reduce the frequency and severity of mania in bipolar disorder, and cost increases are modest considering the clinical gains. The incorporation of more specific cognitive and behavioral content or more effective medication regimens may be necessary to significantly reduce the symptoms of depression.


Author Affiliations: Center for Health Studies, Group Health Cooperative (Drs Simon and Ludman and Ms Operskalski), and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington (Drs Simon, Ludman, and Unützer), Seattle; and Providence Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Brown University, Providence, RI (Dr Bauer).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Adjunctive Psychotherapy for Bipolar Disorder: State of the Evidence
Miklowitz
Am. J. Psychiatry 2008;165:1408-1419.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Family-Focused Treatment for Adolescents With Bipolar Disorder: Results of a 2-Year Randomized Trial
Miklowitz et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 2008;65:1053-1061.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Improving Medical and Psychiatric Outcomes Among Individuals With Bipolar Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Kilbourne et al.
Psychiatr. Serv. 2008;59:760-768.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Pilot Study of Telephone Care Management and Structured Disease Self-Management Groups for Chronic Depression
Ludman et al.
Psychiatr. Serv. 2007;58:1065-1072.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Psychosocial Treatments for Bipolar Depression: A 1-Year Randomized Trial From the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program
Miklowitz et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 2007;64:419-426.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Et al
Evid. Based Ment. Health 2007;10:7-8.
FULL TEXT  

Bibliography BIPOLAR DISORDER
Focus 2007;5:40-43.
FULL TEXT  

Collaborative Care for Bipolar Disorder: Part I. Intervention and Implementation in a Randomized Effectiveness Trial
Bauer et al.
Psychiatr. Serv. 2006;57:927-936.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Collaborative Care for Bipolar Disorder: Part II. Impact on Clinical Outcome, Function, and Costs
Bauer et al.
Psychiatr. Serv. 2006;57:937-945.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Model for Improved Treatment of Bipolar Disorder in an HMO
JWatch Psychiatry 2006;2006:3-3.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.