This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on ISI (34)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Pediatrics  • Child Development  • Autism  • Child Psychiatry  • Alert me on articles by topic

Catherine Lord, PhD; Susan Risi, PhD; Pamela S. DiLavore, PhD; Cory Shulman, PhD; Audrey Thurm, PhD; Andrew Pickles, PhD

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006;63:694-701.

Context  Autism represents an unusual pattern of development beginning in the infant and toddler years.

Objectives  To examine the stability of autism spectrum diagnoses made at ages 2 through 9 years and identify features that predicted later diagnosis.

Design  Prospective study of diagnostic classifications from standardized instruments including a parent interview (Autism Diagnostic Interview–Revised [ADI-R]), an observational scale (Pre-Linguistic Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule/Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule [ADOS]), and independent clinical diagnoses made at ages 2 and 9 years compared with a clinical research team's criterion standard diagnoses.

Setting  Three inception cohorts: consecutive referrals for autism assessment to (1) state-funded community autism centers, (2) a private university autism clinic, and (3) case controls with developmental delay from community clinics.

Participants  At 2 years of age, 192 autism referrals and 22 developmentally delayed case controls; 172 children seen at 9 years of age.

Main Outcome Measures  Consensus best-estimate diagnoses at 9 years of age.

Results  Percentage agreement between best-estimate diagnoses at 2 and 9 years of age was 67, with a weighted of 0.72. Diagnostic change was primarily accounted for by movement from pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified to autism. Each measure at age 2 years was strongly prognostic for autism at age 9 years, with odds ratios of 6.6 for parent interview, 6.8 for observation, and 12.8 for clinical judgment. Once verbal IQ (P = .001) was taken into account at age 2 years, the ADI-R repetitive domain (P = .02) and the ADOS social (P = .05) and repetitive domains (P = .005) significantly predicted autism at age 9 years.

Conclusions  Diagnostic stability at age 9 years was very high for autism at age 2 years and less strong for pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified. Judgment of experienced clinicians, trained on standard instruments, consistently added to information available from parent interview and standardized observation.

Author Affiliations: University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (Drs Lord and Risi); University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (Dr DiLavore); Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel (Dr Shulman); National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Md (Dr Thurm); University of Manchester, Manchester, England (Dr Pickles).

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Epidemiological findings of pervasive developmental disorders in a Venezuelan study
Montiel-Nava and Pena
Autism 2008;12:191-202.
ABSTRACT  

Predicting Outcomes of Children Referred for Autism Using the MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory
Luyster et al.
JSLHR 2007;50:667-681.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT