You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 66 No. 4, April 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  Original Article
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •eFigures
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (22)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Neurology
 •Neurology, Other
 •Psychiatry
 •Schizophrenia
 •Psychiatry, Other
 •Public Health
 •Substance Abuse/ Alcoholism
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Modulation of Mediotemporal and Ventrostriatal Function in Humans by {Delta}9-Tetrahydrocannabinol

A Neural Basis for the Effects of Cannabis sativa on Learning and Psychosis

Sagnik Bhattacharyya, MD; Paolo Fusar-Poli, MD; Stefan Borgwardt, MD; Rocio Martin-Santos, MD, PhD; Chiara Nosarti, PhD; Colin O’Carroll, PhD; Paul Allen, PhD; Marc L. Seal, PhD; Paul C. Fletcher, PhD, FRCPsych; José A. Crippa, MD, PhD; Vincent Giampietro, PhD; Andrea Mechelli, PhD; Zerrin Atakan, FRCPsych; Philip McGuire, PhD, FRCPsych

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009;66(4):442-451.

Context  Cannabis sativa use can impair verbal learning, provoke acute psychosis, and increase the risk of schizophrenia. It is unclear where C sativa acts in the human brain to modulate verbal learning and to induce psychotic symptoms.

Objectives  To investigate the effects of 2 main psychoactive constituents of C sativa, {Delta}9-tetrahydrocannabinol ({Delta}9-THC) and cannabidiol, on regional brain function during verbal paired associate learning.

Design  Subjects were studied on 3 separate occasions using a block design functional magnetic resonance imaging paradigm while performing a verbal paired associate learning task. Each imaging session was preceded by the ingestion of {Delta}9-THC (10 mg), cannabidiol (600 mg), or placebo in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, repeated-measures, within-subject design.

Setting  University research center.

Participants  Fifteen healthy, native English-speaking, right-handed men of white race/ethnicity who had used C sativa 15 times or less and had minimal exposure to other illicit drugs in their lifetime.

Main Outcome Measures  Regional brain activation (blood oxygen level–dependent response), performance in a verbal learning task, and objective and subjective ratings of psychotic symptoms, anxiety, intoxication, and sedation.

Results  {Delta}9-Tetrahydrocannabinol increased psychotic symptoms and levels of anxiety, intoxication, and sedation, whereas no significant effect was noted on these parameters following administration of cannabidiol. Performance in the verbal learning task was not significantly modulated by either drug. Administration of {Delta}9-THC augmented activation in the parahippocampal gyrus during blocks 2 and 3 such that the normal linear decrement in activation across repeated encoding blocks was no longer evident. {Delta}9-Tetrahydrocannabinol also attenuated the normal time-dependent change in ventrostriatal activation during retrieval of word pairs, which was directly correlated with concurrently induced psychotic symptoms. In contrast, administration of cannabidiol had no such effect.

Conclusion  The modulation of mediotemporal and ventrostriatal function by {Delta}9-THC may underlie the effects of C sativa on verbal learning and psychotic symptoms, respectively.


Author Affiliations: Section of Neuroimaging (Drs Bhattacharyya, Fusar-Poli, Borgwardt, Martin-Santos, Allen, Mechelli, Atakan, and McGuire) and Cognition Schizophrenia and Imaging Laboratory (Dr Nosarti), Division of Psychological Medicine and Psychiatry, Department of Biostatistics (Dr Giampietro), and Department of Psychology (Dr Mechelli), Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, and Brain Mapping Unit, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge (Dr Fletcher), England; Section of Psychiatry, Department of Psychobehavioral Health Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy (Dr Fusar-Poli); Psychiatric Outpatient Department, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland (Dr Borgwardt); Pharmacology Research Unit, Municipal Institute for Medical Research–Hospital del Mar, and Psychiatric Department, Institute of Neuroscience, Hospital Clinico, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer–Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en el área de Salud Mental (CIBER-SAM), Barcelona, Spain (Dr Martin-Santos); Department of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, New York (Dr O’Carroll); Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, The University of Melbourne, National Neuroscience Facility, Carlton, Australia (Dr Seal); and Department of Neurosciences and Behavior, Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, and Inct Translational Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil (Dr Crippa).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

This Month in Archives of General Psychiatry
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009;66(4):347.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Induction of Psychosis by {Delta}9-Tetrahydrocannabinol Reflects Modulation of Prefrontal and Striatal Function During Attentional Salience Processing
Bhattacharyya et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 2012;69:27-36.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Does intravenous {Delta}9-tetrahydrocannabinol increase dopamine release? A SPET study
Barkus et al.
J Psychopharmacol 2011;25:1462-1468.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cannabis and First-Episode Psychosis: Different Long-term Outcomes Depending on Continued or Discontinued Use
Gonzalez-Pinto et al.
Schizophr Bull 2011;37:631-639.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cannabidiol Displays Antiepileptiform and Antiseizure Properties In Vitro and In Vivo
Jones et al.
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2010;332:569-577.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

From Real-World Events to Psychosis: The Emerging Neuropharmacology of Delusions
Morrison and Murray
Schizophr Bull 2009;35:668-674.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.