 |
 |

Not-So-Special K's
Let's Limit K-05 Awards
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1998;55:15-16.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
IN THEIR passionate editorial, Holzman et al1 argue strongly against the recent policy change at the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), Rockville, Md, to limit K-05 awards to a single 5-year nonrenewable period. Before debating the validity of their arguments and the merits of the new policy, let's state the new policy explicitly: 5 years of career support is available through an entry-level K award (K-01 or K-08), 10 years of support is available through the midlevel award (K-02), and 5 years of support is available through the K-05. That's 20 years of support. By contrast, virtually all other institutes at the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md, have had a long-standing policy of entry-level career awards that offer only 5 years of supportperiodafter which time funding must be obtained through conventional research grants.
I strongly support the new NIMH policy and applaud Steven E. Hyman, MD, its director, . . . [Full Text of this Article]
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLES
On Preserving the National Institute of Mental Health Career Scientist Award
Philip S. Holzman, David J. Kupfer, and Nancy C. Andreasen
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1998;55(1):12-14.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Principles and Mechanisms: A Response to the Career Scientist Award Controversy
Harold Alan Pincus
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1998;55(1):17-18.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The National Institute of Mental Health Career Scientist Awards
Ross J. Baldessarini
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1998;55(1):19-20.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The K-05 Award Controversy
Steven E. Hyman
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1998;55(1):21-22.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|