You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 55 No. 1, January 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Commentary
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Psychiatry, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Not-So-Special K's

Let's Limit K-05 Awards

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1998;55:15-16.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

IN THEIR passionate editorial, Holzman et al1 argue strongly against the recent policy change at the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), Rockville, Md, to limit K-05 awards to a single 5-year nonrenewable period. Before debating the validity of their arguments and the merits of the new policy, let's state the new policy explicitly: 5 years of career support is available through an entry-level K award (K-01 or K-08), 10 years of support is available through the midlevel award (K-02), and 5 years of support is available through the K-05. That's 20 years of support. By contrast, virtually all other institutes at the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md, have had a long-standing policy of entry-level career awards that offer only 5 years of support—period—after which time funding must be obtained through conventional research grants.

I strongly support the new NIMH policy and applaud Steven E. Hyman, MD, its director, . . . [Full Text of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

On Preserving the National Institute of Mental Health Career Scientist Award
Philip S. Holzman, David J. Kupfer, and Nancy C. Andreasen
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1998;55(1):12-14.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Principles and Mechanisms: A Response to the Career Scientist Award Controversy
Harold Alan Pincus
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1998;55(1):17-18.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The National Institute of Mental Health Career Scientist Awards
Ross J. Baldessarini
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1998;55(1):19-20.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The K-05 Award Controversy
Steven E. Hyman
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1998;55(1):21-22.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.