You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 55 No. 12, December 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Letters to the Editor
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (17)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

"Clinical Significance" and DSM-IV

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The article by Regier et al1 on the limitations of diagnostic criteria and assessment instruments for mental disorders raises important and critical questions. In particular, the use of diagnostic criteria that were developed primarily for clinical decision-making, in epidemiology and other research projects, predictably raises questions about the appropriate choice of thresholds and the resulting rates of false positives and false negatives.2 The article was nicely balanced by commentaries by Frances3 and Spitzer.4 In particular, Frances' discussion of the DSM-IV "clinical significance criteria" was largely undiscussed in the Regier article. It would be useful to understand more explicitly how the DSM-IV clinical significance criteria could have been operationalized in the Epidemiologic Catchment Area study and Diagnostic Interview Schedule, and how they might have affected the data they presented.

Perhaps more importantly, we agree with Spitzer that the authors mistakenly conflate "need for treatment" with "presence of a disorder." Although there . . . [Full Text of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Challenges in Operationalizing the DSM-IV Clinical Significance Criterion
Beals et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 2004;61:1197-1207.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Mild Disorders Should Not Be Eliminated From the DSM-V
Kessler et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 2003;60:1117-1122.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Revised Prevalence Estimates of Mental Disorders in the United States: Using a Clinical Significance Criterion to Reconcile 2 Surveys' Estimates
Narrow et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 2002;59:115-123.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Psychiatric Disorders Among Tortured Bhutanese Refugees in Nepal
Van Ommeren et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 2001;58:475-482.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.