This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (35)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related article  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Health Policy  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1998;55:119.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

REGIER ET al¹ summarize discrepancies in prevalence rates between the Epidemiological Catchment Area (ECA) study and the National Comorbidity Survey (NCS) and provide a useful overview of plausible explanations. I will extend their comments by emphasizing 3 inherent limitations to defining clinical cases in epidemiological studies: (1) the definition of mental disorder in DSM-IV² fails to provide a clear boundary between psychopathology and normality; (2) the concepts "clinical significance" and "medical necessity" are difficult to operationalize and to assess reliably; and (3) lay interviewers do not have the experience necessary to judge clinical significance.

In DSM-IV, the mental disorders are defined as clinically significant behavioral or psychological syndromes causing distress or disability (ie, impairment in functioning). The syndrome must not be an expected response to a particular event (eg, the death of a loved one).

Although this definition assists in decisions on what should be included in the manual, . . . [Full Text of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Limitations of Diagnostic Criteria and Assessment Instruments for Mental Disorders: Implications for Research and Policy
Darrel A. Regier, Charles T. Kaelber, Donald S. Rae, Mary E. Farmer, Barbel Knauper, Ronald C. Kessler, and Grayson S. Norquist
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1998;55(2):109-115.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Issues for DSM-V: Unintended Consequences of Small Changes: The Case of Paraphilias
First and Frances
Am. J. Psychiatry 2008;165:1240-1241.
FULL TEXT  

Challenges in Operationalizing the DSM-IV Clinical Significance Criterion
Beals et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 2004;61:1197-1207.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Psychiatric Symptoms, Social Disability, Low Wellbeing and Need for Treatment: Data from a Population-Based Study
Forsell
Int J Soc Psychiatry 2004;50:195-203.
ABSTRACT  

Prior Juvenile Diagnoses in Adults With Mental Disorder: Developmental Follow-Back of a Prospective-Longitudinal Cohort
Kim-Cohen et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 2003;60:709-717.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Structure and Stability of Common Mental Disorders: The NEMESIS Study
Vollebergh et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 2001;58:597-603.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Comparison of Self-report and Clinical Diagnostic Interviews for Depression: Diagnostic Interview Schedule and Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry in the Baltimore Epidemiologic Catchment Area Follow-up
Eaton et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 2000;57:217-222.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Controversies in Community-Based Psychiatric Epidemiology: Let the Data Speak for Themselves
Blazer II and Kaplan
Arch Gen Psychiatry 2000;57:227-228.
FULL TEXT  

DSM-IV Diagnostic Criterion for Clinical Significance: Does It Help Solve the False Positives Problem?
Spitzer and Wakefield
Am. J. Psychiatry 1999;156:1856-1864.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

"Clinical Significance" and DSM-IV
Pincus et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1998;55:1145-1145.
FULL TEXT  

Midtown Manhattan Prevalence Rates and the Implied Need for Treatment: Meeting the Challenge of Public Mental Health
Millman and Regier
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1998;55:1146-1148.
FULL TEXT  

Are Community Rates of Psychiatric Disorders Accurate?
JWatch Psychiatry 1998;1998:13-13.
FULL TEXT