You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 55 No. 6, June 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Commentary
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (33)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Diagnosis
 •Depression
 •Schizophrenia
 •Alert me on articles by topic

From Kraepelin to Kretschmer Leavened by Schneider

The Transition From Categories of Psychosis to Dimensions of Variation Intrinsic to Homo sapiens

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1998;55:502-504.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

THE KRAEPELINIAN1-2 binary system, it may be said, is dead, but the tyranny of its influence lives on. Notwithstanding a series of critical evaluations,3-6 it pervades textbooks, examinations, and every set of operational diagnostic criteria. Late in life, Kraepelin tried to get the genie back into the bottle:

No experienced psychiatrist will deny there is an alarmingly large number of cases in which it seems impossible, in spite of the most careful observation, to make a firm diagnosis . . . it is becoming increasingly clear that we cannot distinguish satisfactorily between these two illnesses and this brings home the suspicion that our formulation of the problem may be incorrect.7

HOW MANY CATEGORIES?

In their latent class analysis of the large sample in the Roscommon family studies, Kendler and colleagues8 argue that as many as 6 separate categories of psychosis are justified, and moreover that these bear "substantial resemblance to current or historical . . . [Full Text of this Article]


HOW MANY DIMENSIONS, AND OF WHAT?

THE UNIVERSALITY OF PSYCHOSIS

LANGUAGE AND CEREBRAL ASYMMETRY

CONCLUSIONS

RELATED ARTICLES

The Structure of Psychosis: Latent Class Analysis of Probands From the Roscommon Family Study
Kenneth S. Kendler, Laura M. Karkowski, and Dermot Walsh
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1998;55(6):492-499.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Structure of Psychosis: Syndromes and Dimensions
Kenneth S. Kendler and Dermot Walsh
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1998;55(6):508-509.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Interleukin-1 cluster is associated with genetic risk for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder
Papiol et al.
J. Med. Genet. 2004;41:219-223.
FULL TEXT  

Toward Reformulating the Diagnosis of Schizophrenia
Tsuang et al.
Am. J. Psychiatry 2000;157:1041-1050.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Invited commentaries on: Obstetric complications and schizophrenia/affective psychoses
Crow
Br. J. Psychiatry 2000;176:527-529.
FULL TEXT  

Bipolar Disorder: Anomalous Brain Asymmetry Associated With Psychosis
Reite et al.
Am. J. Psychiatry 1999;156:1159-1163.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Structure of Psychosis: Syndromes and Dimensions
Kendler and Walsh
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1998;55:508-509.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.