This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on ISI (5)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related articles  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Statistics and Research Methods  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Reactions to Oldham et al

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999;56:697-698.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

AS MEMBERS of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission (NBAC), we are grateful to Oldham et al for their careful and thoughtful analysis and critique of the NBAC's most recent report.¹ Their analysis demonstrates a clear grasp of both what the NBAC recommended and what reasoning lay behind these recommendations. We are pleased that they agree that many—perhaps most—of the NBAC's recommendations identify valuable protections for potential research subjects. We offer a few observations and responses to their article.

First, Oldham et al² refer to the NBAC's division into "2 formal subcommittees, the Human Subjects Subcommittee and the Genetics Subcommittee." Although the Human Subjects Subcommittee did some preliminary work on the topic of this report, everything in the report and all the recommendations were considered by the commission as a whole. The report is the NBAC's product.

Second, while the NBAC's mandate requires it to concentrate first on 2 areas—research involving . . . [Full Text of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Protection of Persons With Mental Disorders From Research Risk: A Response to the Report of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission
John M. Oldham, Stephan Haimowitz, and Susan J. Delano
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999;56(8):688-693.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The National Bioethics Advisory Commission Report: The Response of the Psychiatric Research Community Is Critical to Restoring Public Trust
Dennis S. Charney
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999;56(8):699-700.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Protecting Vulnerable Research Subjects Without Unduly Constraining Neuropsychiatric Research
Franklin G. Miller and Joseph J. Fins
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999;56(8):701-702.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Reply
John M. Oldham, Stephan Haimowitz, and Susan J. Delano
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999;56(8):703-704.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT