You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 57 No. 6, June 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Commentary
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (19)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Schizophrenia
 •Evidence-Based Medicine
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Evidence-Based Ethics and Informed Consent in Mental Illness Research

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000;57:540-542.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

SOME MEDICAL ethics questions are age-old and may be best understood through careful conceptual analysis and reflection. Some are not. Indeed, some ethics issues have emerged primarily as empirical questions of tremendous significance within modern biomedical science and clinical care. The current controversy surrounding the ethical acceptability of research involving people with mental illness serves as an important illustration of the way in which data may help to resolve contemporary moral questions. For instance, one argument against the participation of mentally ill individuals in research is the presumption that they are unable to make this choice freely and in a manner that appropriately weighs the personal risks of participation in relation to the potential benefits for themselves, science, and society.1 Recent data on the values, motivations, and risk assessments expressed by psychiatric patients may radically challenge these beliefs regarding their capacity for autonomy and altruism in the context of clinical . . . [Full Text of this Article]


RELATED ARTICLE

Decisional Capacity for Informed Consent in Schizophrenia Research
William T. Carpenter, Jr, James M. Gold, Adrienne C. Lahti, Caleb A. Queern, Robert R. Conley, John J. Bartko, Jeffrey Kovnick, and Paul S. Appelbaum
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000;57(6):533-538.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Multimedia Consent for Research in People With Schizophrenia and Normal Subjects: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Jeste et al.
Schizophr Bull 2008;0:sbm148v1-sbm148.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Should research ethics committees be told how to think?
Sayers
J. Med. Ethics 2007;33:39-42.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Perspectives on Medical Research Involving Men in Schizophrenia and HIV-Related Protocols
Roberts et al.
Schizophr Bull 2006;32:360-365.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Meta-Consent in Research on Decisional Capacity: A "Catch-22"?
Saks et al.
Schizophr Bull 2006;32:42-46.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Towards evidence based bioethics
Halpern
BMJ 2005;331:901-903.
FULL TEXT  

Optimistic Bias in the Perception of Personal Risk: Patterns in Schizophrenia
Prentice et al.
Am. J. Psychiatry 2005;162:507-512.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.