You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 57 No. 8, August 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Letters to the Editor
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on ISI (5)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

School Predictors of Schizophrenia

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Cannon et al1 analyzed the predictive power of school performance (in the 1950s) in Finland in terms of later schizophrenia. Schoolchildren who were diagnosed as having schizophrenia in adulthood performed worse at ages 7 to 11 years in the nonacademic domain, mainly in sports and handicrafts. In the Northern Finland 1966 Birth Cohort2 at school in 1970s, we found that being in a lower-than-age-appropriate grade predicted schizophrenia (odds ratio, 2.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-5.1), but school marks, even in the nonacademic domain, did not.3

In a detailed reanalysis, we found somewhat different results from those of Cannon et al. The mean mark in sports among preschizophrenic children was 7.8 and among controls (having no psychiatric hospital care until 28 years of age), 7.9. In Finland, marks given for each subject range from 4 (fail) to 10 (excellent). In handicrafts, the means were 7. 9 and 8.0, respectively. In analysis of . . . [Full Text of this Article]







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.