This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Public Health  • Substance Abuse/ Alcoholism  • Statistics and Research Methods  • Genetics  • Genetic Counseling/ Testing/ Therapy  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

We are concerned that the results appearing to implicate an effect of DRD2 polymorphisms on the susceptibility to heroin dependence¹ may represent statistical artifacts rather than a true genetic effect. To a very large extent, the results are based on estimating the frequencies of haplotypes in cases and controls and testing for a difference, the frequencies being estimated using the MLOCUS program.² Likelihood ratio tests assuming a ² distribution were reported to produce P values as low as 10^–10. A Fisher exact test for 1 haplotype produced a P value of 10^–22.

In case-control studies, haplotypes are not observed directly and their frequencies are only estimated. The authors of the MLOCUS program wrote that the use of the ² distribution could lead to an inflated type I error rate and hence recommended using resampling methods to obtain statistical significance.² Apparently minor errors in the estimation of haplotype frequency can yield . . . [Full Text of this Article]

AUTHOR INFORMATION
David Curtis, MD, PhD; Hugh Gurling, MD, MPhil, FRCPsych

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?