This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (2)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related article  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Journalology/ Peer Review/ Authorship  • Psychiatry, Other  • Evidence-Based Medicine  • Randomized Controlled Trial  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Corrado Barbui, MD; Andrea Cipriani, MD

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The systematic review carried out by Taylor et al¹ suggested that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) begin to have observable beneficial effects in depression during the first week of treatment. This result was obtained from the analysis of randomized controlled trials of SSRIs vs placebo that reported outcomes for at least 2 points in the first 4 weeks of treatment. From 107 trial reports, Taylor et al identified 50 randomized controlled trials meeting the inclusion criteria, of which 28 were incorporated in the primary analysis. This pattern of trial selection was a consequence of the fact that not all studies took repeated-outcome measures and not all studies that took repeated-outcome measures presented the results for all points.

We argue that the criteria of including only studies reporting outcomes for at least 2 points in the first 4 weeks of treatment might have systematically selected . . . [Full Text of this Article]

AUTHOR INFORMATION


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Early Onset of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor Antidepressant Action: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Matthew J. Taylor, Nick Freemantle, John R. Geddes, and Zubin Bhagwagar
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006;63(11):1217-1223.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The evolution of evidence hierarchies: what can Bradford Hill's 'guidelines for causation' contribute?
Howick et al.
JRSM 2009;102:186-194.
FULL TEXT