You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 64 No. 8, August 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Letters to the Editor
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on ISI (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Psychopharmacology
 •Drug Therapy
 •Schizophrenia
 •Alert me on articles by topic

First- vs Second-Generation Antipsychotic Drugs in Schizophrenia

Chittaranjan Andrade, MD; Saifuddin Kharawala, DPM

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The Cost Utility of the Latest Antipsychotic Drugs in Schizophrenia Study (CUtLASS 1)1 found that, in patients with schizophrenia whose medication was changed for clinical reasons, first (FGA)- and second (SGA)-generation antipsychotics were associated with comparable 1-year outcomes on measures of clinical improvement, adverse effects, quality of life, and costs of care. We have several concerns about the study:

  1. During the study, 55 of 118 patients (47%) switched from an FGA to an SGA, but only 36 of 109 (33%) switched from an SGA to an FGA (Figure 11[p1081]); the advantage for the SGA was statistically significant ({chi}21 = 4.35; P < .05). The most commonly prescribed FGA and SGA were sulpiride and olanzapine, respectively; the 1-year persistence rates for these drugs were 28 of 58 (48%) and 37 of 50 (74%), respectively. The advantage for olanzapine was statistically significant ({chi}21 = 7.42; P < .001). Neither . . . [Full Text of this Article]


AUTHOR INFORMATION

RELATED LETTERS

Effectiveness and Cost of Olanzapine and Haloperidol in the Treatment of Schizophrenia: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Robert Rosenheck, Deborah Perlick, Stephen Bingham, Wen Liu-Mares, Joseph Collins, Stuart Warren, Douglas Leslie, Edward Allan, E. Cabrina Campbell, Stanley Caroff, June Corwin, Lori Davis, Richard Douyon, Lawrence Dunn, Denise Evans, Ede Frecska, John Grabowski, David Graeber, Lawrence Herz, Kong Kwon, William Lawson, Felicitas Mena, Javaid Sheikh, David Smelson, and Valerie Smith-Gamble
JAMA. 2003;290(20):2693-2702.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

First- vs Second-Generation Antipsychotic Drugs in Schizophrenia—Reply
Peter B. Jones, Thomas R. E. Barnes, Peter Elton, Linda Davies, Graham Dunn, Helen Lloyd, Karen P. Hayhurst, Robin M. Murray, Alison Marwick, and Shôn Lewis
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007;64(8):979-980.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLE

Randomized Controlled Trial of the Effect on Quality of Life of Second- vs First-Generation Antipsychotic Drugs in Schizophrenia: Cost Utility of the Latest Antipsychotic Drugs in Schizophrenia Study (CUtLASS 1)
Peter B. Jones, Thomas R. E. Barnes, Linda Davies, Graham Dunn, Helen Lloyd, Karen P. Hayhurst, Robin M. Murray, Alison Markwick, and Shôn W. Lewis
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006;63(10):1079-1087.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.