You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 58 No. 1, January 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Abstract
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (30)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Psychiatry, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Parental Origin of the Deletion 22q11.2 and Brain Development in Velocardiofacial Syndrome

A Preliminary Study

Stephan Eliez, MD; Stylianos E. Antonarakis, MD; Michael A. Morris, PhD; Sophie P. Dahoun, MD; Allan L. Reiss, MD

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001;58:64-68.

ABSTRACT

Background  As children with velocardiofacial syndrome (VCFS) develop, they are at increased risk for psychopathology; one third will eventually develop schizophrenia. Because VCFS and the concomitant symptomatology result from a known genetic origin, the biological and behavioral characteristics of the syndrome provide an optimal framework for conceptualizing the associations among genes, brain development, and behavior. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of the parental origin of the 22q11.2 microdeletion on the brain development of children and adolescents with VCFS.

Methods  Eighteen persons with VCFS and 18 normal control subjects were matched individually for age and sex. Results of DNA polymorphism analyses determined the parental origin of the deletion. Nine persons with VCFS had a deletion on the maternally derived chromosome 22; 9 persons, on the paternally derived chromosome 22. High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging scans were analyzed to provide quantitative measures of gray and white matter brain tissue.

Results  Total brain volume was approximately 11% smaller in the VCFS group than in controls. Comparisons between VCFS subgroups (maternal vs paternal microdeletion 22q11.2) indicated a significant 9% volumetric difference in total volume of cerebral gray matter (volume was greater in patients with paternal microdeletion) but not cerebral white matter. Significant age-related changes in gray matter were detected for subjects whose 22q11.2 deletion was on the maternal chromosome.

Conclusions  Children and adolescents with VCFS experience major alterations in brain volumes. Significant reduction in gray matter development is attributable to presence of 22q11.2 microdeletion on the maternal chromosome.



INTRODUCTION
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Subjects and methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

VELOCARDIOFACIAL syndrome (VCFS) is a common genetic condition associated with physical features, including heart malformations, palatal abnormalities, and characteristic facial dysmorphism.1 The high frequency of VCFS (1 in 2000-4000 live births)2 ranks this condition as one of the most common genetic causes of learning disabilities and mild mental retardation. In most diagnosed cases, the syndrome is due to a 3 megabase (Mb) de novo deletion on chromosome 22q11.2,3 and can occur on either parental chromosome. At least 30 genes are encoded in the common deleted segment.4 Among these, a few are expressed in brain tissue, and some are likely to be essential for normal brain development.5, 6, 7

A relation between VCFS and schizophrenia has been suggested through numerous clinical research studies. After Shprintzen et al8 published the first definition of VCFS, evidence from clinical studies demonstrated an increased prevalence of psychiatric disorders in the population with VCFS.9, 10, 11 The early investigations of VCFS and risk for psychopathology noted an elevated incidence of schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorders among adults with this genetic condition.9 A subsequent investigation12 in children and young adults with VCFS proposed an etiologic link with bipolar rather than schizophrenic disorders; 64% of subjects met the DSM-III-R13 criteria for bipolar disorders, whereas only 6% had a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder. More recent publications have pointed again toward a predisposition for schizophrenia.14, 15, 16 At least 4 studies have demonstrated an overrepresentation of the 22q11.2 deletion in samples of persons with a diagnosis of schizophrenia; 2% to 6% of persons with schizophrenia in these samples had the 22q11.2 deletion.17, 18, 19, 20 Of 46 patients with childhood-onset schizophrenia, Nicolson and Rapoport19 found that 6.4% had the 22q11.2 deletion.21 Publications that address the VCFS-schizophrenia association generally concur that 25% to 30% of children with VCFS will eventually develop schizophrenia or psychosis,16 making VCFS the highest known risk factor identified to date for development of this psychiatric disorder, and supporting the notion of VCFS as a potential genetic-developmental model for schizophrenia.

Despite evidence of abnormal brain development in VCFS,22, 23 only one quantitative brain imaging study has been reported to date.24 That study demonstrated volumetric reductions of total brain volume, left parietal lobe, and right cerebellum adjusted for total brain volume in 15 subjects with VCFS compared with 15 normal control subjects. Observation of tissue composition in this sample revealed a significant overall decrease of total gray and white matter tissue in subjects with VCFS. A qualitative investigation of brain morphology also described alterations among 11 subjects with 22q11.2 deletion and schizophrenia,25 suggesting increased frequency of midline anomalies such as cavum vergae and brain atrophy.

To date, investigations have failed to reveal any effect of parental origin of the deletion on the physical phenotype or degree of cognitive impairment in affected individuals.26 However, recent studies reported that familial transmission of the disorder was associated with lower cognitive performance.26, 27 This finding suggests a genetic mechanism leading to a transgenerational deterioration, but genetic evidence for this has not been reported. On the other hand, investigators have found that parental origin of a genetic deletion can have a significant effect on the physical and cognitive phenotype of genetic disorders (eg, Angelman and Prader-Willi syndrome caused by a deletion of 15q11 or uniparental disomy of chromosome 15). This observation relates to a mechanism of gene expression regulation referred to as imprinting. Imprinting of a gene means that this gene is expressed in a manner that depends on the parent of origin of the chromosome, thus resulting, eg, only in expression of the gene located on the maternally derived chromosome.

We present the first evidence that the parental origin of the 22q11.2 deletion has a significant effect on brain development and morphology, and we discuss the potential impact of this finding on the association between schizophrenia and VCFS.


SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Subjects and methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

SUBJECTS

Eighteen subjects (Table 1), 11 male and 7 female, with a mean (± SD) age of 11.9 ± 3.3 years (range, 6.3-17.9 years) and a diagnosis of a 22q11.2 de novo microdeletion confirmed by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) were included in the study. All subjects were identified as having the typical "large" 3 Mb deletion.28 Recruitment was performed through the Northern California VCFS association and advertising on our Web site (http://www-cap.stanford.edu). After providing a complete description of the study to the persons with VCFS and their parents, written informed consent was obtained under protocols approved by the institutional review board of Stanford University, Stanford, Calif. A previous report on brain development in VCFS used a subsample of the subjects reported in this article.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Table 1. Demographic Characteristics of Study Subjects


Eighteen normal control subjects were matched for sex and age (each subject was individually matched within 14 months; mean [± SD] age, 12.5 ± 3.8 years; range, 5.8-19.1 years). Controls were recruited through advertisement in local newspapers and parent groups' newsletters or among nonaffected siblings of children with identified genetic conditions (fragile X and Turner syndromes). A minimum IQ of 85 (1 SD below the population mean) and absence of previous neurologic or psychiatric disorder were used as an inclusion criteria for controls.

GENETIC ANALYSIS

The deletions were verified and their extent was determined by means of 2-color FISH, with cosmid probes DO832 (catechol-O-methyl transferase gene [COMT]) and N48C12 (D22S264) as described.17 The probes are specific for the proximal and distal deletion regions, respectively.29 Parental origins of the deletions were established using DNA polymorphism analysis with standard techniques.17 Subjects and their parents underwent genotyping for D22S941, D22S944, and D22S264, 3 polymorphic dinucleotide repeat markers located within the commonly deleted region. Nine subjects (3 female and 6 male) had deletions of maternal origin; 9 (4 female and 5 male), paternal origin.

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING PROTOCOL, IMAGE PROCESSING, AND MEASUREMENT

Magnetic resonance images of each subject's brain were acquired using a 1.5-T scanner (GE-Signa; General Electric, Milwaukee, Wis). Coronal images were acquired using a 3D-volumetric radio frequency spoiled gradient echo (SPGR) pulse sequence with the following scan parameters: repetition time, 35 milliseconds; echo time, 6 milliseconds; flip angle, 45°; number of excitation, 1; matrix size, 256 x 192 pixels; field of view, 24 cm2; slice thickness, 1.5 mm; 124 slices. The SPGR image data were imported into a publicly available program (BrainImage; A.L.R., Stanford [available at: http://www-cap.stanford.edu/research/neuroimaging/imageanalysis/brainimage.html]) for semiautomated image-processing analysis and quantification. In summary, the image-processing steps are (1) correction of voxel intensity nonuniformity (secondary to inhomogeneity of the radio-frequency field); (2) removal of nonbrain tissues such as scalp, skull, and vasculature; (3) segmentation of the brain into constituent gray and white tissue types using a constrained fuzzy algorithm based on voxel intensity and tissue boundaries; and (4) measurements of gray and white total brain tissue volumes (total brain tissue equals gray plus white tissue). These procedures have been described and validated elsewhere.30

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Distributions were checked for normality and homogeneity of variances. Analyses of total brain tissue, total gray matter, and total white matter were performed using 1-way analyses of variance (ANOVAs), with diagnosis (VCFS vs controls) as a between-subject factor. Post hoc analyses using the Scheffé test were performed to compare further between VCFS subgroups of different parental origin (paternal vs maternal 22q11.2 microdeletion) and controls. Regression analyses were used to test for predictive relationships between age and gray matter volumes. A P value of .05 (2-tailed) was considered significant. Follow-up comparison of correlation coefficients was conducted using Fisher transformations31 with a P value of .05 (1-tailed).


RESULTS
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Subjects and methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

Similar to results of a previous study from our laboratory,24 total brain tissue volume was approximately 11% smaller (ANOVA; F1,34 = 22.0; P<.001) in the VCFS group (1154 ± 97 cm3) relative to controls (1309 ± 102 cm3). Gray (F1,34 = 7.6; P<.01) and white (F1,34 = 22.0; P<.001) matter contributed to this difference.

The ANOVA comparisons (Table 2) indicated a significant difference between the control and VCFS subgroups when comparing total volume of cerebral gray (F2,33 = 7.8; P<.01; Figure 1) and white (F2,33 = 12.2; P<.001) matter. When both subgroups were compared with the controls (follow-up Scheffé tests), the VCFS subgroup with maternal-origin deletions showed significantly decreased volumes of gray (P<.005) and white (F2,33 = 12.2; P<.001) matter compartments. In contrast, the subgroup with deletions of paternal origin showed only decreased cerebral white matter relative to controls (P<.05). Finally, the follow-up Scheffé tests comparing VCFS subgroups indicated that children with the deletion on the maternal chromosome 22 had significantly decreased (P<.05) gray matter volume but no significant difference in white matter volume (P = .41).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Table 2. Gray Matter and White Matter Volumes*




View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 1. Differences in total cerebrum gray tissue volume between subjects with maternal and paternal 22q11.2 deletion and normal control subjects.


Regression analyses indicated that age significantly predicted gray matter volume decrease only for subjects with maternal-origin deletions (R2 = 0.58; P = .02; Figure 2). Using a follow-up Fisher r-to-z transformation, the age–gray matter correlations of controls and subjects with VCFS with the deletion on the maternal chromosome 22 were compared; this comparison did not reach statistical significance (z = 1.61; P = .11).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 2. Developmental paths of gray matter volumes of subjects with maternal and paternal 22q11.2 deletion and normal control subjects. The uppermost regression line shows gray matter volume changes with age in normal controls; the middle line, in subjects with velocardiofacial syndrome (VCFS) due to a paternally derived deletion; and the lowermost line, in subjects with VCFS due to a maternally derived deletion.



COMMENT
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Subjects and methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

A previous publication24 showed that children and adolescents with VCFS experience reduction of gray and white matter tissue volumes. To date, no study has investigated the potential impact of parental origin of the deletion on brain development in VCFS. Our results indicate a significant effect of the parental origin of 22q11.2 microdeletions on brain development in children and adolescents with VCFS (Figure 1). Subjects who inherit their unique set of 22q11.2 genes through the paternal germ line (ie, who have a deletion on the maternal chromosome 22) have reduced volumes of gray matter compared with normal control subjects and patients inheriting these genes only from the maternal germ line. Imprinting and inhibition of the expression of at least 1 gene affecting neuronal proliferation or cell death, dendritic arborization, or creation and elimination of synapses is a possible explanation for this phenomenon. Because white matter tissue tends to be reduced independent of parental origin of the deletion, it seems likely that haplo-insufficiency of another distinct gene(s) also coded in the 22q11.2 region is responsible for this effect. Clear limitations of this preliminary study reside in the limited sample sizes and the cross-sectional nature of data.

Previous evidence that genetic paternal imprinting affects neuronal and brain development has been demonstrated in 2 lines of research. First, support for paternal genetic imprinting is derived from knowledge of another genetic disorder, Angelman syndrome. Persons with this condition, due to paternal uniparental disomy (UPD, abnormal inheritance of both homologue chromosomes from the same parent) for chromosome 15 or maternal deletion of 15q11.1-12, manifest severe mental retardation, absent speech, ataxia, jerky limb movement, and inappropriate laughter.32 Neuropathology studies33, 34 of Angelman syndrome show decreased dendritic arborization and reduction in number of dendritic spines of pyramidal neurons in cortical layers 3 and 5. Second, animal models have provided additional information regarding the involvement of imprinting mechanisms in normal brain development. The creation of maternal and paternal disomic chimeras in mice has been made possible recently through experimental chromosomal rearrangement during early embryonic development.35, 36, 37 These chimeras are embryos consisting of a mixture of cells maternally disomic/normal (ie, a mixture of maternally disomic cells and normal cells [mixed populations]) or paternally disomic/normal. Observations of cerebral and neuronal development in these chimeric mice have suggested that, compared with normal mice and paternal chimeras, augmented development of neurons in the neocortex and the striatum occurs in maternal chimeras. Further, compared with normal littermates, brains of mice with maternal disomy are enlarged, likely the result of double-expressed gene dosage, whereas brains with paternal disomy are reduced in volume. These findings in animal models are consistent with reduction of gray matter in subjects with VCFS who have deletion of the maternal allele as described herein, and suggest an essential role for maternally expressed alleles in cortical and telencephalic development.

The number of publications reporting UPD and the effect of parental imprinting on chromosome 22 is very limited,38 with only a single case report of paternal UPD.39 No obvious impact of UPD of chromosome 22 on clinical phenotype has been detected. However, these reports did not investigate brain development and morphology, and did not assess cognitive abilities using standardized tools.39, 40, 41, 42 Similarly, previous studies looking at the molecular pathophysiology or physical phenotype of VCFS have not pointed to an imprinting effect. Although studies have observed that familial transmission of the disorder results in more severe intellectual disabilities than de novo cases,26, 27 investigators have not explained this finding adequately. It is possible that this observation is a consequence of a recruitment bias of subjects with a maternally deleted deletion, because women with VCFS seem more likely to reproduce than men and are more likely to be identified when a parent of a child with VCFS is affected.16, 26

The differential effect of parental origin of 22q11 deletion on gray matter development has several implications for research on VCFS as well as schizophrenia. First, discovery of a potentially imprinted gene contributing to decreased gray matter in VCFS considerably narrows the number of gene candidates whose hemizygosity is responsible for neuronal development in the 22q11.2 region. Second, smaller gray matter volume exhibited by children with maternal origin of the deletion may place these subjects at increased risk for childhood- or adult-onset schizophrenia. Recent publications in schizophrenia have demonstrated the potential significance of cortical gray matter reduction and support the hypothesis of a premorbid neurodevelopmental etiologic process. Adolescents with childhood-onset schizophrenia experienced a 4-fold decrease of cortical gray matter relative to their normal counterparts.43 In patients with adult-onset schizophrenia, gray matter volume reduction is already evident at first clinical presentation of the disorder44, 45 and appears to explain at least partially the morbid44, 46, 47 and premorbid cognitive features48 associated with this condition. If VCFS, like schizophrenia, is a developmental disorder associated with excessive gray matter reduction, it could provide a potential model for studying etiologic pathways leading to schizophrenia or associated neuropsychiatric disorders. Parental origin of predisposing alleles should be considered when constructing genetic models for schizophrenia, particularly as pertaining to the potential influence of imprinting on the pathogenesis of this neuropsychiatric disorder49 and on cortical development.50

The small subsample sizes of the present study represent an important limitation and necessitate replication with larger groups. In addition, because of statistical power limitation, we did not investigate subregions of the brain to further identify potential differences in neuroanatomical patterns among VCFS subgroups and controls. Future studies will need to validate our preliminary results using larger samples and to investigate potential differences in brain development using longitudinal data. Identification of the parental origin of 22q11.2 microdeletion in adult subjects with VCFS and schizophrenia awaits future research that integrates neuroanatomy, cognition, and psychopathology.


AUTHOR INFORMATION
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Subjects and methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

Accepted for publication September 25, 2000.

The research presented in this article was supported by the Swiss National Research Fund (Dr Eliez) and grants MH01142 and HD31715 from the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (Dr Reiss). This work also was partially supported by grants from the MIND (Medical Investigation of Neurodevelopmental Disorders) Institute, University of California, Davis, and the Packard Foundation, Stanford, Calif (Dr Reiss).

We thank Eric Schmitt and Christopher White for their image acquisition and processing work, Christine Monso-Hinard for the fluorescent in situ hybridization and polymerase chain reaction analyses, Laura van Hertzen and Anni Schönbörner for technical expertise, and Christine Blasey, PhD, for her statistical consultation.

From the Department of Psychiatry, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (Drs Eliez and Reiss); and Division of Medical Genetics, Geneva University School of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland (Drs Antonarakis, Morris, and Dahoun).

Corresponding author and reprints: Stephan Eliez, MD, Department of Psychiatry, Stanford University School of Medicine, 401 Quarry Rd, Stanford, CA 94305-5719 (e-mail: eliez{at}stanford.edu).


REFERENCES
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Subjects and methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

1. Goldberg R, Motzkin B, Marion R, Scambler PJ, Shprintzen RJ. Velo-cardio-facial syndrome: a review of 120 patients. Am J Med Genet. 1993;45:313-319. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
2. Tezenas Du Montcel S, Mendizabai H, Ayme S, Levy A, Philip N. Prevalence of 22q11 microdeletion [letter]. J Med Genet. 1996;33:719.
3. Carlson C, Papolos D, Pandita RK, Faedda GL, Veit S, Goldberg R, Shprintzen R, Kucherlapati R, Morrow B. Molecular analysis of velo-cardio-facial syndrome patients with psychiatric disorders. Am J Hum Genet. 1997;60:851-859. ISI | PUBMED
4. Dunham I, Shimizu N, Roe BA, et al. The DNA sequence of human chromosome 22. Nature. 1999;402:489-495. FULL TEXT | PUBMED
5. Funke B, Saint-Jore B, Puech A, Sirotkin H, Edelmann L, Carlson C, Raft S, Pandita RK, Kucherlapati R, Skoultchi A, Morrow BE. Characterization and mutation analysis of goosecoid-like (GSCL), a homeodomain-containing gene that maps to the critical region for VCFS/DGS on 22q11. Genomics. 1997;46:364-372. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
6. Yamagishi H, Garg V, Matsuoka R, Thomas T, Srivastava D. A molecular pathway revealing a genetic basis for human cardiac and craniofacial defects. Science. 1999;283:1158-1161. FREE FULL TEXT
7. Roberts C, Daw SC, Halford S, Scambler PJ. Cloning and developmental expression analysis of chick Hira (Chira), a candidate gene for DiGeorge syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. 1997;6:237-245. FREE FULL TEXT
8. Shprintzen RJ, Goldberg RB, Lewin ML, Sidoti EJ, Berkman MD, Argamaso RV, Young D. A new syndrome involving cleft palate, cardiac anomalies, typical facies, and learning disabilities: velo-cardio-facial syndrome. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1978;15:56-62.
9. Shprintzen RJ, Goldberg R, Golding-Kushner KJ, Marion RW. Late-onset psychosis in the velo-cardio-facial syndrome [letter]. Am J Med Genet. 1992;42:141-142. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
10. Chow EW, Bassett AS, Weksberg R. Velo-cardio-facial syndrome and psychotic disorders: implications for psychiatric genetics. Am J Med Genet. 1994;54:107-112. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
11. Pulver AE, Nestadt G, Goldberg R, Shprintzen RJ, Lamacz M, Wolyniec PS, Morrow B, Karayiorgou M, Antonarakis SE, Housman D, Kucherlapati R. Psychotic illness in patients diagnosed with velo-cardio-facial syndrome and their relatives. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1994;182:476-478. ISI | PUBMED
12. Papolos DF, Faedda GL, Veit S, Goldberg R, Morrow B, Kucherlapati R, Shprintzen RJ. Bipolar spectrum disorders in patients diagnosed with velo-cardio-facial syndrome: does a hemizygous deletion of chromosome 22q11 result in bipolar affective disorder? Am J Psychiatry. 1996;153:1541-1547. FREE FULL TEXT
13. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Revised Third Edition. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1987.
14. Gothelf D, Frisch A, Munitz H, Rockah R, Aviram A, Mozes T, Birger M, Weizman A, Frydman M. Velocardiofacial manifestations and microdeletions in schizophrenic inpatients. Am J Med Genet. 1997;72:455-461. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
15. Bassett AS, Hodgkinson K, Chow EW, Correia S, Scutt LE, Weksberg R. 22q11 deletion syndrome in adults with schizophrenia. Am J Med Genet. 1998;81:328-337. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
16. Murphy KC, Jones LA, Owen MJ. High rates of schizophrenia in adults with velo-cardio-facial syndrome. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999;56:940-945. FREE FULL TEXT
17. Karayiorgou M, Morris MA, Morrow B, Shprintzen RJ, Goldberg R, Borrow J, Gos A, Nestadt G, Wolyniec PS, Lasseter VK, Eisen H, Childs B, Kazazian HH, Kucherlapati R, Antonarakis SE, Pulver AE, Housman DE. Schizophrenia susceptibility associated with interstitial deletions of chromosome 22q11. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92:7612-7616. FREE FULL TEXT
18. Murphy KC, Jones RG, Griffiths E, Thompson PW, Owen MJ. Chromosome 22qII deletions: an under-recognised cause of idiopathic learning disability. Br J Psychiatry. 1998;172:180-183. FREE FULL TEXT
19. Nicolson R, Rapoport JL. Childhood-onset schizophrenia: rare but worth studying. Biol Psychiatry. 1999;46:1418-1428. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
20. Yan W, Jacobsen LK, Krasnewich DM, Guan XY, Lenane MC, Paul SP, Dalwadi HN, Zhang H, Long RT, Kumra S, Martin BM, Scambler PJ, Trent JM, Sidransky E, Ginns EI, Rapoport JL. Chromosome 22q11.2 interstitial deletions among childhood-onset schizophrenics and "multidimensionally impaired." Am J Med Genet. 1998;81:41-43. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
21. Usiskin SI, Nicolson R, Krasnewich DM, Yan W, Lelane M, Wudarsky M, Hamburger SD, Rapoport JL. Velocardiofacial syndrome in childhood-onset schizophrenia. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1999;38:1536-1543. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
22. Mitnick RJ, Bello JA, Shprintzen RJ. Brain anomalies in velo-cardio-facial syndrome. Am J Med Genet. 1994;54:100-106. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
23. Devriendt K, Thienen MN, Swillen A, Fryns JP. Cerebellar hypoplasia in a patient with velo-cardio-facial syndrome. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1996;38:949-953. ISI | PUBMED
24. Eliez S, Schmitt JE, White CD, Reiss AL. Children and adolescents with velocardiofacial syndrome: a volumetric MRI study. Am J Psychiatry. 2000;157:409-415. FREE FULL TEXT
25. Chow EW, Mikulis DJ, Zipursky RB, Scutt LE, Weksberg R, Bassett AS. Qualitative MRI findings in adults with 22q11 deletion syndrome and schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry. 1999;46:1436-1442. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
26. Ryan AK, Goodship JA, Wilson DI, Philip N, Levy A, Seidel H, Schuffenhauer S, Oechsler H, Belohradsky B, Prieur M, Aurias A, Raymond FL, Clayton-Smith J, Hatchwell E, McKeown C, Beemer FA, Dallapiccola B, Novelli G, Hurst JA, Ignatius J, Green AJ, Winter RM, Brueton L, Brondum-Nielsen K, Scambler PJ. Spectrum of clinical features associated with interstitial chromosome 22q11 deletions: a European collaborative study. J Med Genet. 1997;34:798-804. ABSTRACT
27. Swillen A, Devriendt K, Legius E, Eyskens B, Dumoulin M, Gewillig M, Fryns JP. Intelligence and psychosocial adjustment in velocardiofacial syndrome: a study of 37 children and adolescents with VCFS. J Med Genet. 1997;34:453-458. ABSTRACT
28. Shaikh TH, Kurahashi H, Saitta SC, O'Hare AM, Hu P, Roe BA, Driscoll DA, McDonald-McGinn DM, Zackai EH, Budarf ML, Emanuel BS. Chromosome 22–specific low copy repeats and the 22q11.2 deletion syndrome: genomic organization and deletion endpoint analysis. Hum Mol Genet. 2000;9:489-501. FREE FULL TEXT
29. Kurahashi H, Tsuda E, Kohama R, Nakayama T, Masuno M, Imaizumi K, Kamiya T, Sano T, Okada S, Nishisho I. Another critical region for deletion of 22q11: a study of 100 patients. Am J Med Genet. 1997;72:180-185. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
30. Reiss AL, Hennessey JG, Rubin M, Beach L, Abrams MT, Warsofsky IS, Liu AM, Links JM. Reliability and validity of an algorithm for fuzzy tissue segmentation of MRI. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1998;22:471-479. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
31. Viana MA. Statistical methods for summarizing independent correlational results. J Educ Stat. 1980;5:83-104.
32. Laan LA, Halley DJ, den Boer AT, Hennekam RC, Renier WO, Brouwer OF. Angelman syndrome without detectable chromosome 15q11-13 anomaly: clinical study of familial and isolated cases. Am J Med Genet. 1998;76:262-268. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
33. Kyriakides T, Hallam LA, Hockey A, Silberstein P, Kakulas BA. Angelman's syndrome: a neuropathological study. Acta Neuropathol (Berl). 1992;83:675-678. FULL TEXT | PUBMED
34. Jay V, Becker LE, Chan FW, Perry Sr TL. Puppet-like syndrome of Angelman: a pathologic and neurochemical study. Neurology. 1991;41:416-422. FREE FULL TEXT
35. Surani MA, Barton SC, Norris ML. Nuclear transplantation in the mouse: heritable differences between parental genomes after activation of the embryonic genome. Cell. 1986;45:127-136. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
36. Keverne EB, Fundele R, Narasimha M, Barton SC, Surani MA. Genomic imprinting and the differential roles of parental genomes in brain development. Brain Res Dev Brain Res. 1996;92:91-100. PUBMED
37. Allen ND, Logan K, Lally G, Drage DJ, Norris ML, Keverne EB. Distribution of parthenogenetic cells in the mouse brain and their influence on brain development and behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92:10782-10786. FREE FULL TEXT
38. Shaffer LG, McCaskill C, Adkins K, Hassold TJ. Systematic search for uniparental disomy in early fetal losses: the results and a review of the literature. Am J Med Genet. 1998;79:366-372. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
39. Miny P, Koppers B, Bogadanova N, Schulte-Vallentin M, Horst J, Dworniczak B. Paternal uniparental disomy 22 [abstract]. Med Genet. 1995;7:216.
40. de Pater JM, Schuring-Blom GH, van den Bogaard R, van der Sijs-Bos CJ, Christiaens GC, Stoutenbeek P, Leschot NJ. Maternal uniparental disomy for chromosome 22 in a child with generalized mosaicism for trisomy 22. Prenat Diagn. 1997;17:81-86. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
41. Schinzel AA, Basaran S, Bernasconi F, Karaman B, Yuksel-Apak M, Robinson WP. Maternal uniparental disomy 22 has no impact on the phenotype. Am J Hum Genet. 1994;54:21-24. ISI | PUBMED
42. Robinson WP, Bernasconi F, Basaran S, Yuksel-Apak M, Neri G, Serville F, Balicek P, Haluza R, Farah LM, Luleci G, Schinzel AA. A somatic origin of homologous Robertsonian translocations and isochromosomes. Am J Hum Genet. 1994;54:290-302. ISI | PUBMED
43. Rapoport JL, Giedd JN, Blumenthal J, Hamburger S, Jeffries N, Fernandez T, Nicolson R, Bedwell J, Lenane M, Zijdenbos A, Paus T, Evans A. Progressive cortical change during adolescence in childhood-onset schizophrenia: a longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999;56:649-654. FREE FULL TEXT
44. Gur RE, Turetsky BI, Bilker WB, Gur RC. Reduced gray matter volume in schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999;56:905-911. FREE FULL TEXT
45. Zipursky RB, Lambe EK, Kapur S, Mikulis DJ. Cerebral gray matter volume deficits in first episode psychosis. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1998;55:540-546. FREE FULL TEXT
46. Gold S, Arndt S, Nopoulos P, O'Leary DS, Andreasen NC. Longitudinal study of cognitive function in first-episode and recent-onset schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 1999;156:1342-1348. FREE FULL TEXT
47. Mohamed S, Paulsen JS, O'Leary D, Arndt S, Andreasen N. Generalized cognitive deficits in schizophrenia: a study of first-episode patients. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999;56:749-754. FREE FULL TEXT
48. Cornblatt B, Obuchowski M, Roberts S, Pollack S, Erlenmeyer-Kimling L. Cognitive and behavioral precursors of schizophrenia. Dev Psychopathol. 1999;11:487-508. FULL TEXT | ISI |