You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 59 No. 3, March 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  This Month in Archives of General Psychiatry
 This Article
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

This Month in Archives of General Psychiatry

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2002;59:211.

Family and twin studies suggest that early-onset and later-onset major depressive disorder (MDD) may have distinct etiologies and correlates. In a prospective study of a birth cohort followed until age 26 years, Jaffee et al (SEE ARTICLE) found that those whose MDD onset was in childhood (before age 15 years) experienced higher levels of early childhood psychosocial risks compared with those whose MDD onset was in adulthood (ages 18-26 years), including perinatal insults and motor skills deficits, caretaker instability, and psychopathology in their family of origin, and behavioral and socioemotional problems. Those with adult-onset MDD experienced similarly low levels of risk as the never-depressed group (with the exception of elevated childhood sexual abuse).

A commentary by Myrna M. Weissman (SEE ARTICLE) is included.

Fergusson and Woodward (SEE ARTICLE) used data gathered over the course of a 21-year longitudinal study to examine the continuities and consequences of adolescent (ages 14-16 years) depression. Results suggested the presence of 2 major pathways linking early depression to later outcomes. First, there was a direct linkage between early depression and increased risks of later depression or anxiety disorders. Second, the associations between early depression and other outcomes (substance dependence, educational underachievement, suicide attempts, unemployment, and early parenthood) were explained by confounding social, family, and individual factors.

Thase et al (SEE ARTICLE) studied the utility of a switch across antidepressant classes in 168 chronically depressed patients who had not responded to 12 weeks of double-blind therapy with imipramine hydrochloride or sertraline hydrochloride. Results indicated a significant tolerability advantage for the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, but the drugs had comparable efficacy after taking attrition rates into account.

The stress-diathesis model predicts that the magnitude of stress at illness onset should be inversely proportional to the level of underlying diathesis. Kendler et al (SEE ARTICLE) were unable to confirm 3 predictions of the stress-diathesis model for phobias in more than 7500 epidemiologically sampled twins. No relationship was found between the severity of trauma at onset of phobias (a measure of stress) and 2 indices of the diathesis: risk of phobias in co-twin or level of the personality trait of neuroticism. These results are more consistent with nonassociative models of phobia acquisition than with traditional etiologic theories involving conditioning or social transmission.

Serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SRI) medications are effective for both major depressive disorder (MDD) and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), but there has been scant evidence as to whether they had the same or different effects on brain function in these 2 disorders. Saxena et al (SEE ARTICLE) found that pretreatment to posttreatment changes in brain glucose metabolism differed significantly between 3 groups of subjects (OCD alone, MDD alone, and concurrent OCD + MDD) that were treated with the same dose of the SRI, paroxetine, and between responders and nonresponders. These findings suggest that the effects of SRIs on brain activity are both disorder specific and response specific.

Improving the discovery and evaluation of psychotropic drugs would have enormous scientific, economic, and public health implications. Klein et al (SEE ARTICLE) present many technical recommendations that could be currently effected by institutional leaders. However, some substantive suggestions require increased resources, both scientific and clinical, as well as federal initiatives to establish a proactive, pharmacological development agency.

Commentaries by Paul Leber (SEE ARTICLE) and Alan J. Gelenberg (SEE ARTICLE) are included.

Carpenter (SEE ARTICLE) describes the growing concern with commercialism in the creation and dissemination of therapeutic knowledge. He specifies sources of relatively unbiased appraisal of clinical trials and notes a discordance in this information and industry-sponsored education regarding pharmacotherapy of schizophrenia. Carpenter provides specific suggestions for addressing potential commercial bias in psychopharmacology research and education.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.