You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 66 No. 6, June 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  Original Article
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •Abstract
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (14)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Psychiatry
 •Psychiatry, Other
 •Public Health
 •Tobacco
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

β2-Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Availability During Acute and Prolonged Abstinence From Tobacco Smoking

Kelly P. Cosgrove, PhD; Jeffery Batis, PhD; Frederic Bois, PhD; Paul K. Maciejewski, PhD; Irina Esterlis, PhD; Tracy Kloczynski, MA; Stephanie Stiklus, BA; Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin, PhD; Stephanie O’Malley, PhD; Edward Perry, MD; Gilles Tamagnan, PhD; John P. Seibyl, MD; Julie K. Staley, PhD

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009;66(6):666-676. doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.41

ABSTRACT



Context  Available levels of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors containing the β2 subunit (β2*-nAChR) are higher in recently abstinent tobacco smokers compared with participants who never smoked. Variations in β2*-nAChR availability during the course of abstinence may be related to the urge to smoke, the extent of nicotine withdrawal, and successful abstinence.

Objective  To examine changes in β2*-nAChR availability during acute and prolonged abstinence from tobacco smoking and to determine how changes in β2*-nAChR availability were related to clinical features of tobacco smoking.

Design  Tobacco smokers participated in up to 4 iodide 123–labeled 5-iodo-A-85380 ([123I]5-IA) single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) scans during abstinence at 1 day (n = 7) and 1 (n = 17), 2 (n = 7), 4 (n = 11), and 6 to 12 (n = 6) weeks. Age-matched nonsmokers participated in a single [123I]5-IA SPECT scan. All participants completed 1 magnetic resonance imaging study.

Setting  Academic imaging center.

Participants  Tobacco smokers (n = 19) and an age-matched nonsmoker comparison group (n = 20).

Main Outcome Measure  The [123I]5-IA SPECT images were converted to distribution volume and were analyzed using regions of interest.

Results  Compared with nonsmokers, β2*-nAChR availability in the striatum, cortex, and cerebellum of smokers was not different at 1 day of abstinence, was significantly higher at 1 week of abstinence, and was not different at 4 or at 6 to 12 weeks of abstinence. In smokers, β2*-nAChR availability was significantly lower in the cortex and cerebellum at 6 to 12 weeks compared with 1 week of abstinence. In addition, cerebellar β2*-nAChR availability at 4 weeks of abstinence was positively correlated with craving on the day of the SPECT scan.

Conclusions  These data suggest that higher β2*-nAChR availability persists up to 1 month of abstinence and normalizes to nonsmoker levels by 6 to 12 weeks of abstinence from tobacco smoking. These marked and persistent changes in β2*-nAChR availability may contribute to difficulties with tobacco cessation.



INTRODUCTION


 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

A wealth of evidence from postmortem1-3 and preclinical4-7 studies demonstrates smoking- and nicotine-induced elevations in nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) throughout the brain. We previously demonstrated in vivo higher available levels of nAChR containing the β2 subunit (β2*-nAChR) in recently abstinent tobacco smokers compared with individuals who never smoked (nonsmokers).8 Higher β2*-nAChR availability in smokers may be due to a variety of molecular changes, including increased assembly of α4 and β2 subunits in the endoplasmic reticulum,9 increased transport of receptors to the membrane,10 decreased receptor turnover,11 and/or the presence of nicotine-promoting intracellular maturation of the α4β2-nAChR to a high-affinity conformation.12 Higher β2*-nAChR availability is thought to functionally reflect higher numbers of desensitized receptors.13-14 In addition, smoking 1 cigarette led to receptor occupancy of more than 88%,13 suggesting that smokers maintain saturation of β2*-nAChRs during the day. Thus, a chronic tobacco smoker who maintains persistently elevated nicotine levels may experience repeated cycles of nAChR activation and desensitization in the course of each day.14

Preclinical studies have demonstrated that nAChR levels return to control levels after termination of nicotine exposure but with great variability in the time course.15-17 A postmortem human study indicated that individuals who had quit smoking at least 2 months before their death (range, 2 months to 30 years) had nicotine binding levels similar to those of control nonsmokers.2 A recent in vivo study in a small number of male smokers demonstrated a trend for a normalization of the β2*-nAChR availability by 21 days of smoking cessation.18 However, these data need to be confirmed in a larger, more heterogeneous population during prolonged abstinence.

The exact subunit combination of nAChR that upregulates in response to nicotine is emerging. The nAChRs that contain α4 and β2 subunits19-20 are the most abundant nAChRs in the brain, and nicotine demonstrates the highest affinity for these receptors.21 In recent years, evidence has emerged that the β2*-nAChRs are a critical neural substrate mediating the effects of nicotine in the brain. Much of this information has been derived from studies in β2 knockout mice. These studies have demonstrated that the β2 subunit is critical for self-administration,22 conditioned place preference,23 discriminative stimulus and taste aversion,24 dopamine release,22, 25-26 dopamine-dependent locomotor activation,27 and enhancement of incentive aspects of motivation28 of nicotine. Studies in wild-type animals further confirm that the β2 subunit is critical to the reinforcing properties of nicotine.29 The β2 subunit also determines the sensitivity to nicotine30-32 but does not play a critical role in nicotine withdrawal symptoms in rodents.33 Nicotine-induced increases in nAChR, termed upregulation, are conferred by a specific microdomain that is in the β2 subunit,34 and thus this upregulation is confined to nAChRs that contain the β2 subunit.4, 19, 31, 35-38

Availability of β2*-nAChR can be measured in vivo with the radiotracer iodide 123–labeled 5-iodo-A-85380([123I]5-IA) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). The nicotinic agonist [123I]5-IA binds with high affinity to the nicotine-binding site on nAChRs that contain the β2 subunit.39 This ligand demonstrates low nonspecific binding40 and has acceptable dosimetry in humans with high brain uptake41-42 and good test-retest reproducibility.43 Because [123I]5-IA is administered at a trace dose (<1% occupancy) for SPECT, it does not interfere with receptor and cell function. Imaging with [123I]5-IA SPECT in nonhuman primates and humans results in a binding pattern that is consistent with the established regional distribution of β2-nAChR and is highest in the thalamus and intermediate throughout the cortex and cerebellum.43-44

The primary goal of the present study was to evaluate the time course of change in β2*-nAChR availability during prolonged abstinence by using [123I]5-IA SPECT. A secondary goal was to explore the relationships between β2*-nAChR availability and behavioral features of tobacco smoking and withdrawal. We hypothesized that during acute abstinence (ie, at 1 day of withdrawal), β2*-nAChR availability would be lower compared with 1 week of abstinence because of the presence of nicotine in the brain, which would block radiotracer binding. Consistent with our previous study,8 we hypothesized that, compared with control nonsmokers, β2*-nAChR availability would be higher at 1 week of withdrawal and then would progressively decline during the course of prolonged abstinence.


METHODS


 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

PARTICIPANTS

Nineteen healthy tobacco smokers (9 men and 10 women; mean [SD] age, 41.1 [9.0] years; 13 white American, 5 African American, and 1 Hispanic American) and 20 age-matched healthy control participants (9 men and 11 women; mean [SD] age, 42.4 [9.8] years; 10 white American, 7 African American, 2 Hispanic, and 1 Asian American) participated in this study. Smokers participated in up to 4 [123I]5-IA SPECT scans and 1 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study. Participants were grouped by the following abstinence times (mean [SD]): 1 day (1.0 [0] days; n = 7), 1 week (7.7 [1.4] days; n = 17), 2 weeks (17.9 [3.0] days; n = 7), 4 weeks (30.5 [4.3] days; n = 11), and 6 to 12 weeks (69.0 [23.5] days; n = 6). Participants were grouped as described because of the difficulty in retaining participants who remained abstinent for long periods and because of the challenges in having participants complete time-consuming (eg, >8 h/d) scans on multiple days. Participants were scanned during a range of days at each time point because of scheduling constraints. Nonsmoker controls (n = 20) participated in 1 [123I]5-IA SPECT scan and 1 MRI study.

This study was approved by the Yale University School of Medicine Human Investigation Committee, the West Haven Veterans Administration Human Subjects Subcommittee, and the Radiation Safety Committee. The use of the radiotracer [123I]5-IA was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. Participants were recruited from the community by word of mouth, posters, and newspaper advertisements. Eligibility was determined as follows. All participants underwent a medical examination by a study physician (E.P.) to exclude any major medical issues or neurological disorders. This included a physical examination, electrocardiography, serum chemistry evaluations, thyroid function studies, complete blood cell count, urinalysis, and urine toxicological screening. Participants were given structured interviews using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV to rule out any Axis I disorder except for nicotine dependence. All tobacco smokers had to smoke at least 10 cigarettes per day for at least 1 year. Smoking status was confirmed by plasma cotinine levels of more than 150 ng/mL, urine cotinine levels of more than 100 ng/mL (to convert to nanomoles per liter, multiply by 5.675), and carbon monoxide levels of more than 11 ppm on the day of intake. Smokers were helped to quit smoking using clinical practice guidelines and contingency management.45-47 Briefly, contingency management is a behavioral therapy in which reinforcement is provided contingent on a successful response. In this study, monetary reinforcement was provided contingent on abstinence from smoking measured by urine cotinine and breath carbon monoxide levels. Breath carbon monoxide and urine cotinine levels were monitored daily for the first 8 days of smoking cessation and a minimum of twice weekly thereafter. Participants were instructed that they could not use any form of nicotine replacement therapy or medication throughout the study. All controls were nonsmokers (defined as having smoked <100 cigarettes in their lifetime) and had no history of significant medical illness or major head trauma. Nonsmoking status was confirmed by plasma cotinine levels of less than 15 ng/mL, urine cotinine levels of less than 100 ng/mL, and carbon monoxide levels of less than 11 ppm on the day of intake and the day of the scan. All women were required to have a negative pregnancy test result during the screening process and before radiotracer injection on each study day. Plasma nicotine and cotinine levels were measured as previously described.8 Urine cotinine levels were measured using cotinine test strips (Accutest NicoMeter [Jant Pharmacal Corporation, Encino, California] or NicAlert [Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation, Hasbrouck Heights, New Jersey]).

The severity of nicotine dependence was assessed at intake with the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence,48 and craving and nicotine withdrawal symptoms were assessed with the Urge to Smoke Questionnaire (QSU)49 and the Minnesota Nicotine Withdrawal Scale,50 respectively, at baseline (ie, on the day of their intake before quitting smoking) and on each day they underwent [123I]5-IA SPECT scans. The QSU has 2 main factors, the intention/desire to smoke (QSU-Intent) and relief of negative affect and withdrawal (QSU-Relief).

MRI STUDIES

The MRI studies were obtained on a 1.5-T camera (Siemens AG, Munich, Germany) in a standard orientation (echo time, 5-7 ms; repetition time, 24 ms; 256 x 192 matrix; number of signals acquired, 1; field of view, 30 cm; 124 contiguous sections with 1.2-mm thickness) and were used for coregistration to the SPECT images to provide an anatomical guide for placement of regions of interest.

[123I]5-IA SPECT SCANS

All participants received a 0.6-g saturated solution of potassium iodide (to protect their thyroid from possible exposure to radioactive iodide) in the hour before radiotracer administration. The radiotracer [123I]5-IA was synthesized as previously described51 and administered as a bolus to constant infusion at a ratio of 7.0 for 8 hours. Participants were injected with mean (SD) equivalent doses of a bolus and constant infusion as follows: control nonsmokers (157.9 [14.6] MBq and 22.8 [2.1] MBq/h, respectively) and smokers abstinent 1 day (134.5 [24.6] MBq and 20.5 [3.8] MBq/h, respectively), 1 week (154.3 [15.9] MBq and 22.2 [2.6] MBq/h, respectively), 2 weeks (159.4 [5.6] MBq and 23.3 [0] MBq/h, respectively), 4 weeks (158.9 [7.4] MBq and 22.6 [1.7] MBq/h, respectively), and 6 to 12 weeks (141.5 [30.5] MBq and 21.9 [3.5] MBq/h, respectively). Three consecutive 30-minute emission scans and one 15-minute simultaneous transmission and emission protocol scan were obtained from hours 6 to 8 of the [123I]5-IA infusion on a SPECT camera (PRISM 3000 XP; Picker, Cleveland, Ohio). The SPECT camera is a 3-headed camera equipped with a low-energy, ultrahigh-resolution fan-beam collimator (photopeak window, 159 keV ± 10%; matrix, 128 x 128) with a uniform sensitivity across the field of view. A cobalt 57–distributed source was measured with each experiment to control for day-to-day variation in camera sensitivity. The axial resolution (full width at half maximum) is 12.2 mm, measured with a [123I] line source in water in a cylindrical phantom. Blood was drawn before injection and at the beginning and end of the emission scans for analysis of plasma total parent and free fraction of parent tracer in plasma (free fraction). The chemical fate of [123I]5-IA after the injection was assessed in plasma as previously described.51 Briefly, plasma total parent was assessed by acetonitrile protein denaturation, whereas the free fraction was determined by ultrafiltration (Centrifree units; Amicon, Beverly, Massachusetts).

IMAGE ANALYSIS AND OUTCOME MEASURES

Images were reconstructed and analyzed as previously described, including a nonuniform attenuation correction43 with 1 exception. Specifically, in participants who underwent more than 1 SPECT scan, the second and subsequent SPECT scans were coregistered to the same position as the first scan to apply the same region-of-interest template for that subject. The MRIs were coregistered to the SPECT scans to provide an anatomical guide for placement of the regions of interest using commercially available software (MEDx, version 3.4; Medical Numerics, Inc, Maryland). Regions of interest chosen were those known to contain β2-nAChRs and included frontal, parietal, anterior cingulate, temporal, and occipital cortices and the thalamus, striatum (an average of caudate and putamen), and cerebellum. Regions of interest were corrected to account for differences in size. Two raters (K.P.C. and J.B.) conducted the analysis. Variability between the raters was less than 12% across the regions of interest. The mean of the analysis from the 2 raters is reported.

The outcome measure of regional activity divided by the free plasma parent between 6 and 8 hours (VT/fP) was used to correct for possible differences in radiotracer metabolism or plasma protein binding between groups and participants. Specifically, VT/fP equals [123I]5-IA uptake in a region of interest divided by the free plasma parent (both measured in kilobecquerels per milliliter).52 We refer to VT/fP as β2*-nAChR availability because we are only measuring receptors that are "available" to be bound by the radiotracer. Receptors that are already occupied (ie, by residual nicotine, by a pharmacologically active metabolite [cotinine or nornicotine], or by endogenous neurotransmitter [acetylcholine]) are not available. The outcome measure VT/fP is proportional to the binding potential (Bmax/KD, in milliliters per gram), which is proportional to the receptor number (Bmax) at equilibrium, given the assumptions that there is no change in affinity (KD) and that nondisplaceable (nonspecific and free) uptake does not differ between participants or comparison groups. As described previously,43 there is no appropriate reference region for this radiotracer, so nondisplaceable [123I]5-IA uptake could not be measured. The measures of total plasma parent, free fraction, and free plasma parent (fP; which is defined as total parent x free fraction) were compared between groups to determine differences in radiotracer metabolism or protein binding.

STATISTICAL ANALYSES

Data were analyzed using SAS, version 9.1 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, North Carolina). We assessed differences in blood measures (total and free parent and free fraction) and regional β2*-nAChR availability, VT/fP, between participants in the nonsmoker control group and each of the abstinent smoker groups at 1 day and 1, 2, 4, and 6 to 12 weeks using 2-sample t tests. Differences in regional brain VT/fP and behavioral measures of tobacco smoking and withdrawal between participants in the abstinent smoker groups were assessed using repeated-measures mixed-effects regression models with group as a fixed effect and compound symmetry covariance structure across repeated measurements. We evaluated these between-group differences using repeated-measures mixed-effects models to account for the observations between abstinent smoker groups that were not entirely independent, given that some abstinent smokers contribute observations to more than 1 group. For models examining between-group differences for which there was a significant effect of group, we conducted 4 planned post hoc between-group comparisons (ie, between abstinent smokers at 1 week and at 1 day and 2, 4, and 6-12 weeks). For these post hoc tests, P values were Bonferroni corrected for multiple comparisons, and statistical significance was considered at P ≤ .00625. Correlational analyses for the associations between receptor availability and smoking assessments were conducted using SPSS, version 16.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Illinois). Correlations among β2*-nAChR availability, VT/fP, at each point, and clinical variables (smoking, craving, and withdrawal) were assessed with Spearman correlation coefficients ({rho}). Different slopes for each abstinence point were estimated to illustrate the relationship between significant clinical variables and β2*-nAChR availability. Owing to multiple comparisons, statistical significance was considered at P ≤ .01.


RESULTS


 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

CLINICAL POPULATION

Nineteen tobacco smokers and 20 age-matched nonsmokers were included in the study. Smokers who participated in scans at different times since the last cigarette were equivalent in age, level of nicotine dependence (as assessed by the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence at intake), number of cigarettes smoked per day, and years of smoking (Table 1). Plasma cotinine and nicotine and carbon monoxide levels were negligible in nonsmokers and were highest at 1 day of abstinence and decreased over time in smokers, confirming abstinence from smoking (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Table 1. Demographics and Smoking Characteristics of Nonsmoker Control Subjects and Smokers During Acute and Prolonged Abstinencea


β2*-nAChR AVAILABILITY DURING ACUTE AND PROLONGED ABSTINENCE

There were no differences between groups in injected dose, bolus to infusion ratio, or time of scan (data not shown). Concentrations of [123I]5-IA activity in the blood were measured to correct for potential differences between groups in radiotracer metabolism or protein binding. There were significant differences in total parent levels between nonsmokers and smokers abstinent 1 day and in free fraction levels between nonsmokers and smokers abstinent 2 weeks (Table 2). There were no differences in total parent or free fraction levels between groups at other time points or between groups at any time point in free parent levels. There was also variability between smokers who participated in multiple scans in changes in β2*-nAChR availability over time, with some abstinent smokers showing dramatic changes in β2*-nAChR availability (≤48% change in the cortex) and others showing barely any difference (eg, <5%) over time (individual data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Table 2. Blood [123I]5-IA Measures of Nonsmoker Control Subjects and Smokers During Acute and Prolonged Abstinencea


Regional β2*-nAChR availability, reflected by VT/fP, was compared between nonsmokers and each of the abstinent smoker groups and between the abstinent smoker groups (Table 3, Figure 1, and Figure 2). In smokers abstinent 1 day compared with nonsmokers, VT/fP was significantly reduced in the thalamus. In smokers abstinent 1 week compared with nonsmokers, VT/fP was significantly higher in the striatum and cerebellum and throughout the cortex. In smokers abstinent 4 weeks compared with nonsmokers, VT/fP was significantly higher in the occipital cortex (Table 3 and Figures 1 and 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Table 3. β2*-nAChR Availability Throughout the Brain in Nonsmoker Control Subjects and Smokers During Acute and Prolonged Abstinence



Figure 1
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 1. Availability of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor containing the β2 subunit (β2*-nAChR) measured as regional activity divided by the free plasma parent. Availability is shown in individual nonsmokers (NS) and tobacco smokers at 1 day and 1, 2, 4, and 6 to 12 weeks of abstinence in the thalamus (A), striatum (average of caudate and putamen) (B), cortex (average of cortical regions including parietal, frontal, anterior cingulate, temporal, and occipital cortices) (C), and cerebellum (D). The line in each scatterplot represents the mean value of those participants. *Significant difference from control nonsmokers after Bonferroni correction using 2-sample t tests. {dagger}Significant difference from smokers abstinent 1 week after Bonferroni correction using planned post hoc between-group comparisons subsequent to the analysis of repeated-measures mixed-effects regression models, including the overall effect of abstinent smoker group.



Figure 2
View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 2. Mean parametric images illustrating the availability of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor containing the β2 subunit in nonsmokers and tobacco smokers. Measurements for the smokers were obtained at 1 day and 1, 2, 4, and 6 to 12 weeks of abstinence at similar transaxial levels of the brain. The color scale is shown with red, yellow, green, and blue corresponding to values for regional activity divided by the free plasma parent.


Among the abstinent smoker groups, there were significant between-group differences in VT/fP in the thalamus (F4,25 = 4.12; P = .01), parietal cortex (F4,25 = 2.95; P = .04), frontal cortex (F4,25 = 2.88; P = .04), anterior cingulate (F4,25 = 3.75; P = .02), occipital cortex (F4,25 = 3.42; P = .02), and cerebellum (F4,25 = 4.00; P = .01). Compared with smokers abstinent 1 week, those abstinent 1 day had significantly lower VT/fP in the thalamus (t25 = –3.51; corrected P = .007) and cerebellum (t25 = –3.02; corrected P = .02). Compared with smokers abstinent 1 week, those abstinent 6 to 12 weeks had significantly lower VT/fP in the parietal cortex (t25 = –2.87; corrected P = .03), frontal cortex (t25 = –2.80; corrected P = .04), anterior cingulate (t25 = –3.21; corrected P = .01), occipital cortex (t25 = –3.10; corrected P = .02), and cerebellum (t25 = –3.17; corrected P = .02). There were no significant differences in VT/fP between tobacco smokers abstinent 1 week and smokers abstinent 2 or 4 weeks (Table 3 and Figures 1 and 2).

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN β2*-nAChR AVAILABILITY AND CLINICAL FEATURES

There were significant differences in QSU-Intent (F4,25 = 7.41; P < .001) and QSU-Relief scores (F4,25 = 5.63; P = .002), but not in Minnesota Nicotine Withdrawal Scale scores (F4,25 = 0.33; P = .86), between groups of abstinent smokers (Table 4). Specifically, overall group differences in QSU-Intent and QSU-Relief scores were attributable to significantly higher levels of each of these measures on the day of the scan in the smokers abstinent 1 day compared with those abstinent at other points.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Table 4. Clinical Characteristics of Smokers During Acute and Prolonged Abstinencea


There were significant correlations between regional β2*-nAChR availability and clinical features and assessment scores at baseline, eg, at intake before quitting smoking (Table 5). Specifically, baseline QSU-Intent scores correlated negatively with β2*-nAChR availability at 1 day of abstinence in the thalamus ({rho} = –0.90; P = .006) and parietal cortex ({rho} = –0.88; P = .008). There were also significant correlations between regional β2*-nAChR availability and assessment scores taken at each abstinence point (Table 6). Specifically, a positive correlation was observed between cerebellar β2*-nAChR availability and craving on the QSU-Intent ({rho} = 0.74; P = .01) and QSU-Relief ({rho} = 0.74; P = .01) scores at 4 weeks of abstinence. There were no significant correlations between baseline smoking variables (eg, Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence, number of years smoked, or number of cigarettes smoked per day) with β2*-nAChR availability at any point (data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Table 5. Correlations Between β2*-nAChR Availability and Baseline Assessments



View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Table 6. Correlations Between β2*-nAChR Availability and Assessments on Day of Scan



COMMENT


 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

The present study examined the time course of changes in β2*-nAChR availability during acute and prolonged abstinence in tobacco smokers compared with nonsmokers by using [123I]5-IA SPECT. The present findings demonstrate higher β2*-nAChR availability in the striatum, cerebellum, and cerebral cortex in tobacco smokers at 1 week of abstinence compared with nonsmokers, but β2*-nAChR availability similar to or lower than that of nonsmokers at 1 day and 6 to 12 weeks of abstinence. Although there is not a significant difference between β2*-nAChR availability in smokers at 2 and 4 weeks of abstinence compared with nonsmokers, there remains a robust difference, that is, higher β2*-nAChR availability in smokers at 2 weeks (16%-23%) and 4 weeks (14%-18%) of abstinence in the striatum, cerebellum, and cortex compared with nonsmokers that does not return to nonsmoker levels until 6 to 12 weeks of abstinence (–4% to 5% difference). There are 2 primary implications to these results. First, at 1 day of abstinence, there is still residual nicotine or a pharmacologically active metabolite of nicotine, such as cotinine or nornicotine, present in the brain that interferes with radiotracer binding, thus leading to the appearance of lower β2*-nAChR availability. Second, the normalization of the β2*-nAChR is prolonged, requiring up to 6 to 12 weeks of abstinence to fully return to nonsmoker levels.

In the smokers abstinent 1 day, the levels of total parent of the radiotracer were significantly lower, but normalized quickly, by 1 week of abstinence. This finding highlights the impact of nicotine or another chemical in tobacco smoke on metabolism, eg, because nicotine was still present, it may have changed the metabolism of the radiotracer, resulting in lower total parent levels at 1 day of abstinence. Cytochrome P450 (CYP2A6) is primarily responsible for the metabolism of nicotine to its main metabolite cotinine.53 There is evidence that nicotine is metabolized faster in smokers than in nonsmokers, and there are genetically mediated differences in the metabolism of nicotine in smokers.54 In addition, nicotine can interfere with the metabolism of other drugs.55 Consistently, we expect that [123I]5-IA is metabolized in the liver by enzymes in the cytochrome P450 family, such as CYP2A6, which acts on nicotine, and CYP2B6 and CYP2D6, which catalyze the dealkylation of aromatic ethers.56-57 In radiotracer imaging studies, it is imperative that brain uptake is corrected for radiotracer metabolism because differences in metabolism of the radiotracer determine how much radiotracer is available to the brain. That is, fast metabolizers will have less radiotracer available to the brain, whereas slow metabolizers will have more radiotracer available to the brain for a given dose. By using the outcome measure VT/fP, we corrected for individual differences in radiotracer metabolism and protein binding.

In the present study, we report a negative correlation between baseline craving scores before smoking cessation and β2*-nAChR availability at 1 day of abstinence in the thalamus and parietal cortices. Because receptor availability is defined as receptors that are available to be bound by the radiotracer, at 1 day of abstinence participants with lower receptor availability have more nicotine present in the brain occupying receptors and blocking the radiotracer from binding to the receptor. Thus, we believe that participants who reported high baseline craving likely smoked more cigarettes immediately before their quit day and had lower receptor availability at 1 day of abstinence. However, the experience of craving in the presence of nicotine occupancy of the β2*-nAChR is not unusual. Smokers experience craving within 2 hours of their last cigarette, despite continued occupancy of the receptor by nicotine.13 Dopamine release has been associated with the feeling of craving,58 and nicotine59 and cotinine60 have been shown to facilitate dopamine release; thus, the prolonged partial occupancy of the receptor by nicotine or cotinine may contribute to the feelings of craving that are reported 2 hours after the last cigarette and throughout the first week of abstinence.

We also report a positive correlation between craving on the day of the scan at 4 weeks of abstinence and cerebellar β2*-nAChR availability at 4 weeks of abstinence. Thus, individuals with higher cerebellar β2*-nAChR availability at 4 weeks of abstinence report a greater urge to smoke on that day. Associations between nicotine and craving have previously been identified in the thalamus61-62 and generally in areas associated with emotion and reward and areas with high densities of nAChRs.63 A previous study found associations between craving and regions subserving motor functions, including the primary motor cortex, premotor cortex, and supplementary motor area,64 which require input from the cerebellum. In addition, when smokers are told to resist craving actively during cigarette cue exposure, the motor cortex is deactivated.65 Our finding of a link between the cerebellum and craving further suggests that craving has a motor component, so that craving for cigarettes may elicit preparation for action or voluntary movement, goal-directed actions (eg, lighting a cigarette or bringing a cigarette up to the mouth), and/or motor imagery that are linked to the motor system.66-67 It can be estimated that during the course of 20 years, a smoker who consumed 1 pack per day (assuming 11 puffs on average per cigarette68) may perform the action of bringing a lit cigarette to the mouth more than 1.5 million times. Thus, the physical action of smoking a cigarette is likely to be critically tied to craving during abstinence.

In addition to the role of the cerebellum in motor functions, there is increasing interest in the involvement of the cerebellum in cognition. Specifically, activation of the cerebellum has been associated with tasks requiring explicit, episodic memory (eg, recall of autobiographical events).69-70 With regard to drug abuse, imaging studies have determined that the cerebellum is activated in response to smoking-related cues71 and is associated with cue-induced craving in cocaine abusers72-73 and recently abstinent alcoholics.74 Activity in the cerebellum has also been linked to executive dysfunction in cocaine users.75 Together these studies and the present findings highlight the cerebellum as a brain region that is critically linked to craving by both motor and cognitive functions.

We report no significant correlations between nicotine withdrawal and β2*-nAChR availability. This is consistent with the preclinical literature suggesting that the β2*-subtype does not play a critical role in the physical symptoms of nicotine withdrawal.33, 76 In this study, participants reported a mild-to-moderate level of nicotine withdrawal symptoms at baseline and over the course of the study; thus, these results require replication in a larger sample with a greater range of nicotine withdrawal symptoms. In addition, we did not obtain significant correlations between β2*-nAChR availability at 1 week of abstinence and clinical features. We previously found a negative correlation between the urge to smoke to relieve withdrawal symptoms and β2*-nAChR availability in the sensorimotor cortex at approximately 1 week of abstinence.8 This discrepancy may be due to differences in correlational analysis methods, that is, voxel-based analyses in the previous study vs Spearman correlations with regions of interest in the present study. Voxel-based analyses may be more sensitive to detecting significance in smaller brain regions, but that was beyond the scope of the present study. The lack of additional correlations at 1 week of abstinence was discussed previously.8

Consistent with our previous study,8 we report significantly higher β2*-nAChR availability in smokers at 1 week of abstinence in the cortex, striatum, and cerebellum but not in the thalamus compared with nonsmokers. The difference between recently abstinent smokers and nonsmokers in the previous study8 was of a greater magnitude (26%-36% in the cerebral cortex and 27% in the striatum) than in the present study (21%-29% in the cerebral cortex and 22% in the striatum). This may be because of the older average age (approximately 5 years) of participants in the current study, because β2*-nAChR availability has been shown to decrease with age in nonsmokers.77 This study and previous in vivo positron emission tomography78 and SPECT8, 18 studies report no upregulation of thalamic β2*-nAChR availability during acute abstinence, which conflicts with the findings of postmortem2 and animal8, 79 studies. In general, this may be because of differences in methods or the higher relative dose of nicotine in the postmortem and animal studies. However, 2 smokers in the present study exhibited increased β2*-nAChR availability in the thalamus compared with nonsmokers, highlighting the role of individual differences in receptor regulation.

These findings are also consistent with those of a previous study18 demonstrating that higher β2*-nAChR availability in recently abstinent tobacco smokers compared with nonsmokers is temporary. In the previous study in men, β2*-nAChR availability decreased to nonsmoker levels in some participants by 21 days of abstinence. Specifically, compared with nonsmokers, smokers had significantly lower β2*-nAChR availability at 4 hours of abstinence, significantly higher β2*-nAChR availability at 10 days of abstinence, and similar β2*-nAChR availability at 21 days of abstinence. In addition, they reported significantly lower β2*-nAChR availability at 21 days of abstinence compared with 10 days of abstinence. One difference is that the previous study had significantly lower β2*-nAChR availability in all regions at 4 hours of abstinence compared with the nonsmokers, whereas the current study reports lower β2*-nAChR availability in the thalamus but similar β2*-nAChR availability in the striatum and cerebellum and throughout the cortex compared with the nonsmoker group at 1 day of abstinence. This finding is interesting and likely attributable to high levels of residual nicotine or metabolites present in the brain at 4 hours of abstinence (vs approximately 24 hours in the present study), resulting in lower β2*-nAChR availability. Also, although the present study did not find a significant decrease, on average, in β2*-nAChR availability by 4 weeks of abstinence compared with 1 week of abstinence, in some participants normalization had occurred by this point. The high heterogeneity of the subject population in the present study compared with the previous study in men only18 likely accounts for the high individual variability with regard to receptor changes during prolonged abstinence. Thus, the present study contributes to the literature with a larger, more heterogeneous subject group, a more prolonged period of abstinence, and additional assessments of behavioral features of tobacco smoking.

Previous preclinical studies demonstrated that, in animals receiving long-term nicotine treatment, nAChR levels returned to levels observed in control animals after termination of nicotine administration, but with variable timing ranging from 1 to 3 weeks.15, 80-81 The previous human study18 indicated a return to control levels within 21 days of abstinence, and the present study indicates that, on average, β2*-nAChR availability in recently abstinent tobacco smokers does not normalize until 4 to 12 weeks, although this is highly variable between individuals. The differences in the time course changes may result from differences in dosing regimen, chronicity of nicotine administration, route of administration, metabolism between species, specificity of the radioligand, or sex and/or genetic differences in nAChR subunit expression and composition of nicotinic agonist binding sites. However, when taken together, the results consistently highlight a return to control levels or normalization of the β2*-nAChR availability after termination of long-term nicotine administration. The preclinical studies support a process of prolonged normalization when we consider that 1 to 3 weeks is substantial in the life span of a rodent. In addition, this prolonged normalization of the receptor availability is in line with the protracted withdrawal symptoms reported by tobacco smokers. For example, although withdrawal symptoms such as anger, anxiety, depression, and difficulty concentrating tend to peak within the first week after smoking cessation, they continue up to 4 weeks after the cessation attempt.82 We are currently examining variables that may be associated with the rate of normalization.

One limitation of this study is that [123I]5-IA measures the availability of the β2 subunit of nAChR, primarily the α4β2 subunit, but other subunits also contribute to the regulation of nAChR by tobacco smoking. The β2 subunit has been linked primarily to the reinforcing effects of nicotine22, 28, 83 and combines with the α3-6 subunits. Different β2* subunit combinations appear to be differentially regulated by nicotine, with α36, α6α4β2*, and α5α4β2* not upregulating or decreasing in response to nicotine,38, 84-87 whereas α6β2 (non-α4) subunits of nAChR increase in response to nicotine.87 The nAChR subunit expression varies regionally, and differential regulation of these distinct subunit combinations that are measured by a single nicotinic agonist ligand such as [123I]5-IA will result in regional differences in the degree of upregulation in smokers and the degree of receptor normalization during abstinence. Thus, we are likely measuring the β2 subunit in combination with α3-6 subunits, leaving the in vivo measurement of the β3 and α7 subunits for the future, with further radiotracer development. The α7 and β3 subunits have been implicated in modulating dopamine release14, 88 and thus may also play a role in the rewarding properties of tobacco smoke. Although the α7 subunit does not upregulate in response to chronic nicotine use,31 it is critically involved along with the β2 subunit in mediating desensitization/inactivation of the neuronal nAChRs in response to chronic nicotine.89

In summary, our data extend the findings of previous studies8, 18 that showed that the upregulation of the β2*-nAChR in recently abstinent tobacco smokers was temporary and could be measured with [123I]5-IA SPECT imaging. Specifically, we demonstrate that the normalization of upregulated β2*-nAChR in tobacco smokers during smoking cessation is prolonged. This is consistent with the clinical course of tobacco smoking in which craving, withdrawal symptoms, and risk for relapse are prolonged. The variation between individuals in the magnitude of upregulation and rates of normalization may ultimately be used to delineate subgroups based on genetics, sex, and comorbid mental illness and thus to target treatment medications.


AUTHOR INFORMATION


 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

Correspondence: Kelly P. Cosgrove, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, 950 Campbell Ave, Mail Code 116A6, West Haven, CT 06516 (kelly.cosgrove{at}yale.edu).

Submitted for Publication: June 5, 2008; final revision received October 28, 2008; accepted November 14, 2008.

Financial Disclosure: None reported.

Funding/Support: This study was supported in part by grants RO1 DA015577 and KO2 DA21863 (Dr Staley), KO1 DA20651 (Dr Cosgrove), P50 DA13334 and P50 AA15632 (Dr O’Malley), K25 NS044316 (Dr Maciejewski), and T32 14276 from the National Institute of Health.

Disclaimer: The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, the National Institute on Drug Abuse, or the National Institutes of Health.

Additional Contributions: Marina Picciotto, PhD, and Robert Makuch, PhD, provided helpful comments on the manuscript. Louis Amici, BS, and the nuclear technologists at the Institute for Neurodegenerative Disorders provided technical assistance. The laboratory of Peter Jatlow, MD, determined plasma nicotine and cotinine levels.

Author Affiliations: Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine (Drs Cosgrove, Batis, Bois, Maciejewski, Esterlis, Krishnan-Sarin, O’Malley, Perry, and Staley and Mss Kloczynski and Stiklus), Department of Psychiatry, Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System (Drs Cosgrove, Batis, Bois, Esterlis, Perry, and Staley and Mss Kloczynski and Stiklus), and Institute for Neurodegenerative Disorders (Drs Tamagnan and Seibyl), West Haven, Connecticut.


REFERENCES


 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

1. Benwell ME, Balfour DJ, Anderson JM. Evidence that tobacco smoking increases the density of (–)-[3H]nicotine binding site in human brain. J Neurochem. 1988;50(4):1243-1247. WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
2. Breese CR, Marks MJ, Logel J, Adams CE, Sullivan B, Collins AC, Leonard S. Effect of smoking history on [3H]nicotine binding in human postmortem brain. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1997;282(1):7-13. FREE FULL TEXT
3. Perry DC, Dávila-García MI, Stockmeier CA, Kellar KJ. Increased nicotinic receptors in brains from smokers: membrane binding and autoradiography studies. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1999;289(3):1545-1552. FREE FULL TEXT
4. Nguyen HN, Rasmussen BA, Perry DC. Subtype-selective up-regulation by chronic nicotine of high-affinity nicotinic receptors in rat brain demonstrated by receptor autoradiography. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2003;307(3):1090-1097. FREE FULL TEXT
5. Schwartz RD, Kellar KJ. Nicotinic cholinergic receptor binding sites in the brain: regulation in vivo. Science. 1983;220(4593):214-216. FREE FULL TEXT
6. Abreu-Villaça Y, Seidler F, Qiao D, Tate CA, Cousins MM, Thillai I, Slotkin TA. Short-term adolescent nicotine exposure has immediate and persistent effects on cholinergic systems: critical periods, patterns of exposure, dose thresholds. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2003;28(11):1935-1949. WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
7. Nashmi R, Xiao C, Deshpande P, McKinney S, Grady SR, Whiteaker P, Huang Q, McClure-Begley T, Lindstrom JM, Labarca C, Collins AC, Marks MJ, Lester HA. Chronic nicotine cell specifically upregulates functional α4* nicotinic receptors: basis for both tolerance in midbrain and enhanced long-term potentiation in perforant path. J Neurosci. 2007;27(31):8202-8218. FREE FULL TEXT
8. Staley JK, Krishnan-Sarin S, Cosgrove KP, Krantzler E, Frohlich E, Perry E, Dubin JA, Estok K, Brenner E, Baldwin RM, Tamagnan GD, Seibyl JP, Jatlow P, Picciotto MR, London ED, O’Malley S, van Dyck CH. Human tobacco smokers in early abstinence have higher levels of β2* nicotinic acetylcholine receptors than nonsmokers. J Neurosci. 2006;26(34):8707-8714. FREE FULL TEXT
9. Nashmi R, Dickinson ME, McKinney S, Jareb M, Labarca C, Fraser SE, Lester HA. Assembly of α4β2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors assessed with functional fluorescently labeled subunits: effects of localization, trafficking, and nicotine-induced upregulation in clonal mammalian cells and in cultured midbrain neurons. J Neurosci. 2003;23(37):11554-11567. FREE FULL TEXT
10. Harkness PC, Millar NS. Changes in conformation and subcellular distribution of α4β2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors revealed by chronic nicotine treatment and expression of subunit chimeras. J Neurosci. 2002;22(23):10172-10181. FREE FULL TEXT
11. Peng X, Gerzanich V, Anand R, Whiting P, Lindstrom J. Nicotine-induced increase in neuronal nicotinic receptor results from a decrease in the rate of receptor turnover. Mol Pharmacol. 1994;46(3):523-530. ABSTRACT
12. Sallette J, Pons S, Devillers-Thiery A, Soudant M, Prado de Carvalho L, Changeux JP, Corringer PJ. Nicotine upregulates its own receptors through enhanced intracellular maturation. Neuron. 2005;46(4):595-607. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
13. Brody AL, Mandelkern MA, London ED, Olmstead RE, Farahi J, Scheibal D, Jou J, Allen V, Tiongson E, Chefer SI, Koren AO, Mukhin AG. Cigarette smoking saturates brain α4β2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006;63(8):907-915. FREE FULL TEXT
14. Picciotto MR, Addy NA, Mineur YS, Brunzell DH. It is not "either/or": activation and desensitization of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors both contribute to behaviors related to nicotine addiction and mood. Prog Neurobiol. 2008;84(4):329-342. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
15. Pietilä K, Lahde T, Attila M, Ahtee L, Nordberg A. Regulation of nicotinic receptors in the brain of mice withdrawn from chronic oral nicotine treatment. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1998;357(2):176-182. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
16. Collins AC, Romm E, Wehner JM. Dissociation of the apparent relationship between nicotine tolerance and up-regulation of nicotinic receptors. Brain Res Bull. 1990;25(3):373-379. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
17. Koylu E, Demirgören S, London ED, Pögün S. Sex difference in up-regulation of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in rat brain. Life Sci. 1997;61(12):PL185-PL190. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE
18. Mamede M, Ishizu K, Ueda M, Mukai T, Iida Y, Kawashima H, Fukuyama H, Togashi K, Saji H. Temporal change in human nicotinic acetylcholine receptor after smoking cessation: 5IA SPECT study. J Nucl Med. 2007;48(11):1829-1835. FREE FULL TEXT
19. Flores CM, Rogers SW, Pabreza LA, Wolfe BB, Kellar KJ. A subtype of nicotinic cholinergic receptor in rat brain is composed of α4 and β2 subunits and is up-regulated by chronic nicotine treatment. Mol Pharmacol. 1992;41(1):31-37. ABSTRACT
20. Benowitz NL, Porchet H, Jacob P III. Nicotine dependence and tolerance in man: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic investigations. Prog Brain Res. 1989;79:279-287. WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
21. Wu J, Liu Q, Yu K, Hu J, Kuo YP, Segerberg M, St John PA, Lukas RJ. Roles of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor β subunits in function of human α4-containing nicotinic receptors. J Physiol. 2006;576(pt 1):103-118. FREE FULL TEXT
22. Picciotto MR, Zoli M, Rimondin RI, Léna C, Marubio LM, Pich EM, Fuxe K, Changeux JP. Acetylcholine receptors containing the β2 subunit are involved in the reinforcing properties of nicotine. Nature. 1998;391(6663):173-177. FULL TEXT | PUBMED
23. Walters CL, Brown S, Changeux JP, Martin B, Damaj MI. The β2 but not the α7 subunit of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor is required for nicotine-conditioned place preference in mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2006;184(3-4):339-344. FULL TEXT | PUBMED
24. Shoaib M, Gommans J, Morley A, Stolerman I, Grailhe R, Changeux J. The role of nicotinic receptor beta-2 subunits in nicotine discrimination and conditioned taste aversion. Neuropharmacology. 2002;42(4):530-539. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
25. Epping-Jordan MP, Picciotto MR, Changeux JP, Pich EM. Assessment of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunit contributions to nicotine self-administration in mutant mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1999;147(1):25-26. FULL TEXT | PUBMED
26. Grady SR, Meinerz NM, Cao J, Reynolds AM, Picciotto MR, Changeux JP, McIntosh JM, Marks MJ, Collins AC. Nicotinic agonists stimulate acetylcholine release from mouse interpeduncular nucleus: a function mediated by a different nAChR than dopamine release from striatum. J Neurochem. 2001;76(1):258-268. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
27. King SL, Caldarone BJ, Picciotto MR. β2-Subunit–containing nicotinic acetylcholine receptors are critical for dopamine-dependent locomotor activation following repeated nicotine administration. Neuropharmacology. 2004;47(suppl 1):132-139. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
28. Brunzell DH, Chang JR, Schneider B, Olausson P, Taylor JR, Picciotto MR. β2-Subunit–containing nicotinic acetylcholine receptors are involved in nicotine-induced increases in conditioned reinforcement but not progressive ratio responding for food in C57BL/6 mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2006;184(3-4):328-338. FULL TEXT | PUBMED
29. Liu X, Koren AO, Yee SK, Pechnick RN, Poland RE, London ED. Self-administration of 5-iodo-A-85380, a β2-selective nicotinic receptor ligand, by operantly trained rats. Neuroreport. 2003;14(11):1503-1505. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
30. Marubio LM, del Mar Arroyo-Jimenez M, Cordero-Erausquin M, Léna C, Le Novère N, de Kerchove d’Exaerde A, Huchet M, Damaj MI, Changeux JP. Reduced antinociception in mice lacking neuronal nicotinic receptor subunits. Nature. 1999;398(6730):805-810. FULL TEXT | PUBMED
31. McCallum SE, Collins AC, Paylor R, Marks MJ. Deletion of the beta 2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunit alters development of tolerance to nicotine and eliminates receptor upregulation. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2006;184(3-4):314-327. FULL TEXT | PUBMED
32. Tritto T, McCallum SE, Waddle SA, Hutton SR, Paylor R, Collins AC, Marks MJ. Null mutant analysis of responses to nicotine: deletion of β2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunit but not α7 subunit reduces sensitivity to nicotine-induced locomotor depression and hypothermia. Nicotine Tob Res. 2004;6(1):145-158. ABSTRACT
33. Besson M, David V, Suarez S, Cormier A, Cazala P, Changeux JP, Granon S. Genetic dissociation of two behaviors associated with nicotine addiction: beta-2 containing nicotinic receptors are involved in nicotine reinforcement but not in withdrawal syndrome. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2006;187(2):189-199. FULL TEXT | PUBMED
34. Sallette J, Bohler S, Benoit P, Soudant M, Pons S, Le Novère N, Changeux JP, Corringer PJ. An extracellular protein microdomain controls upregulation of neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors by nicotine. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(18):18767-18775. FREE FULL TEXT
35. Dávila-García MI, Musachio JL, Kellar KJ. Chronic nicotine administration does not increase nicotinic receptors labeled by [125I]-epibatidine in adrenal gland, superior cervical ganglia, pineal or retina. J Neurochem. 2003;85(5):1237-1246. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
36. Flores CM, Dávila-García MI, Ulrich YM, Kellar KJ. Differential regulation of neuronal nicotinic receptor binding sites following chronic nicotine administration. J Neurochem. 1997;69(5):2216-2219. WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
37. Marks MJ, Rowell PP, Cao JZ, Grady SR, McCallum SE, Collins AC. Subsets of acetylcholine-stimulated 86Rb+ efflux and [125I]-epibatidine binding sites in C57BL/6 mouse brain are differentially affected by chronic nicotine treatment. Neuropharmacology. 2004;46(8):1141-1157. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
38. Mao D, Perry DC, Yasuda RP, Wolfe BB, Kellar KJ. The α4β2α5 nicotinic cholinergic receptor in rat brain is resistant to up-regulation by nicotine in vivo. J Neurochem. 2008;104(2):446-456. WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
39. Mukhin AG, Gündisch D, Horti AG, Koren AO, Tamagnan G, Kimes AS, Chambers J, Vaupel DB, King SL, Picciotto MR, Innis RB, London ED. 5-Iodo-A-85380, an α4β2 subtype-selective ligand for nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Mol Pharmacol. 2000;57(3):642-649. FREE FULL TEXT
40. Horti AG, Koren AO, Lee KS, Mukhin AG, Vaupel DB, Kimes AS, Stratton M, London ED. Radiosynthesis and preliminary evaluation of 5-[123/125I]iodo-3-(2[S]-azetidinylmethoxy)pyridine: a radioligand for nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Nucl Med Biol. 1999;26(2):175-182. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
41. Fujita M, Seibyl JP, Vaupel DB, Tamagnan G, Early M, Zoghbi SS, Baldwin RM, Horti AG, Koren AO, Mukhin AG, Khan S, Bozkurt A, Kimes AS, London ED, Innis RB. Whole-body biodistribution, radiation absorbed dose, and brain SPET imaging with [123i]5-i-A-85380 in healthy human subjects. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2002;29(2):183-190. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
42. Ueda M, Iida Y, Mukai T, Mamede M, Ishizu K, Ogawa M, Magata Y, Konishi J, Saji H. 5-[123I]Iodo-A-85380: assessment of pharmacological safety, radiation dosimetry and SPECT imaging of brain nicotinic receptors in healthy human subjects. Ann Nucl Med. 2004;18(4):337-344. WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
43. Staley JK, van Dyck CH, Weinzimmer D, Brenner E, Baldwin RM, Tamagnan GD, Riccardi P, Mitsis E, Seibyl JP. 123I-5-IA-85380 SPECT measurement of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in human brain by the constant infusion paradigm: feasibility and reproducibility. J Nucl Med. 2005;46(9):1466-1472. FREE FULL TEXT
44. Chefer SI, Horti AG, Lee KS, Koren AO, Jones DW, Gorey JG, Links JM, Mukhin AG, Weinberger DR, London ED. In vivo imaging of brain nicotinic acetylcholine receptors with 5-[123I]iodo-A-85830 using single photon emission computed tomography. Life Sci. 1998;63(25):PL355-PL360. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
45. Stitzer ML, Bigelow GE. Contingent reinforcement for reduced breath carbon monoxide levels: target-specific effects on cigarette smoking. Addict Behav. 1985;10(4):345-349. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
46. Stitzer ML, Rand CS, Bigelow GE, Mead AM. Contingent payment procedures for smoking reduction and cessation. J Appl Behav Anal. 1986;19(2):197-202. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
47. Roll JM, Higgins ST, Badger GJ. An experimental comparison of three different schedules of reinforcement of drug abstinence using cigarette smoking as an exemplar. J Appl Behav Anal. 1996;29(4):495-505. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
48. Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, Fagerstrom KO. The Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire. Br J Addict. 1991;86(9):1119-1127. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
49. Tiffany ST, Drobes DJ. The development and initial validation of a questionnaire on smoking urges. Br J Addict. 1991;86(11):1467-1476. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
50. Hatsukami DK, Hughes JR, Pickens RW, Svikis D. Tobacco withdrawal symptoms: an experimental analysis. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1984;84(2):231-236. FULL TEXT | PUBMED
51. Zoghbi SS , Tamagnan G, Baldwin MF, Al-Tikriti MS, Amici L, Seibyl JP, Innis RB. Measurement of plasma metabolites of (S)-5-[123I]iodo-3-(2-azetidinylmethoxy) pyridine (5-IA-85380), a nicotinic acetylcholine receptor imaging agent, in non-human primates. Nucl Med Biol. 2001;28(1):91-96. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
52. Innis RB, Cunningham VJ, Delforge J, Fujita M, Gjedde A, Gunn RN, Holden J, Houle S, Huang SC, Ichise M, Iida H, Ito H, Kimura Y, Koeppe RA, Knudsen GM, Knuuti J, Lammertsma AA, Laruelle M, Logan J, Maguire RP, Mintun MA, Morris ED, Parsey R, Price JC, Slifstein M, Sossi V, Suhara T, Votaw JR, Wong DF, Carson RE. Consensus nomenclature for in vivo imaging of reversibly binding radioligands. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2007;27(9):1533-1539. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
53. Malaiyandi V, Sellers EM, Tyndale RF. Implications of CYP2A6 genetic variation for smoking behaviors and nicotine dependence. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2005;77(3):145-158. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
54. Mwenifumbo JC, Tyndale RF. Genetic variability in CYP2A6 and the pharmacokinetics of nicotine. Pharmacogenomics. 2007;8(10):1385-1402. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
55. Desai HD, Seabolt J, Jann MW. Smoking in patients receiving psychotropic medications: a pharmacokinetic perspective. CNS Drugs. 2001;15(6):469-494. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
56. Baldwin RM, Zoghbi SS, Staley JK, Brenner E, Al-Tikriti MS, Amici L, Fujita M, Innis RB, Tamagnan G. Chemical fate of the nicotinic acetylcholinergic radiotracer [123I]5-IA-85380 in baboon brain and plasma. Nucl Med Biol. 2006;33(4):549-554. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
57. Lewis DF. Human cytochromes P450 associated with the phase 1 metabolism of drugs and other xenobiotics: a compilation of substrates and inhibitors of the CYP1, CYP2 and CYP3 families. Curr Med Chem. 2003;10(19):1955-1972. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
58. Adinoff B. Neurobiologic processes in drug reward and addiction. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2004;12(6):305-320. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
59. Benwell ME, Balfour DJ. The effects of acute and repeated nicotine treatment on nucleus accumbens dopamine and locomotor activity. Br J Pharmacol. 1992;105(4):849-856. WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
60. Dwoskin LP, Teng L, Buxton ST, Crooks PA. (S)-(–)-Cotinine, the major brain metabolite of nicotine, stimulates nicotinic receptors to evoke [3H]dopamine release from rat striatal slices in a calcium-dependent manner. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1999;288(3):905-911. FREE FULL TEXT
61. Rose JE, Behm FM, Westman EC, Mathew RJ, London ED, Hawk TC, Turkington TG, Coleman RE. PET studies of the influences of nicotine on neural systems in cigarette smokers. Am J Psychiatry. 2003;160(2):323-333. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
62. Due DL, Huettel SA, Hall WG, Rubin DC. Activation in mesolimbic and visuospatial neural circuits elicited by smoking cues: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Psychiatry. 2002;159(6):954-960. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
63. McClernon FJ, Gilbert DG. Human functional neuroimaging in nicotine and tobacco research: basics, background, and beyond. Nicotine Tob Res. 2004;6(6):941-959. FREE FULL TEXT
64. Smolka MN, Buhler M, Klein S, Zimmermann U, Mann K, Heinz A, Braus DF. Severity of nicotine dependence modulates cue-induced brain activity in regions involved in motor preparation and imagery. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2006;184(3-4):577-588. FULL TEXT | PUBMED
65. Brody AL, Mandelkern MA, Olmstead RE, Jou J, Tiongson E, Allen V, Scheibal D, London ED, Monterosso JR, Tiffany ST, Korb A, Gan JJ, Cohen MS. Neural substrates of resisting craving during cigarette cue exposure. Biol Psychiatry. 2007;62(6):642-651. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
66. Porro CA, Francescato MP, Cettolo V, Diamond ME, Baraldi P, Zuiani C, Bazzocchi M, di Prampero PE. Primary motor and sensory cortex activation during motor performance and motor imagery: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurosci. 1996;16(23):7688-7698. FREE FULL TEXT
67. Cunnington R, Windischberger C, Deecke L, Moser E. The preparation and readiness for voluntary movement: a high-field event-related fMRI study of the Bereitschafts-BOLD response. Neuroimage. 2003;20(1):404-412. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
68. Hammond D, Fong GT, Cummings KM, Hyland A. Smoking topography, brand switching, and nicotine delivery: results from an in vivo study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14(6):1370-1375. FREE FULL TEXT
69. Andreasen NC, O’Leary DS, Cizadlo T, Arndt S, Rezai K, Watkins GL, Ponto LL, Hichwa RD. Remembering the past: two facets of episodic memory explored with positron emission tomography. Am J Psychiatry. 1995;152(11):1576-1585. WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
70. Gao JH, Parsons LM, Bower JM, Xiong J, Li J, Fox PT. Cerebellum implicated in sensory acquisition and discrimination rather than motor control. Science. 1996;272(5261):545-547. ABSTRACT
71. Lee JH, Lim Y, Wiederhold BK, Graham SJ. A functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI) study of cue-induced smoking craving in virtual environments. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2005;30(3):195-204. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
72. Grant S, London ED, Newlin DB, Villemagne VL, Liu X, Contoreggi C, Phillips RL, Kimes AS, Margolin A. Activation of memory circuits during cue-elicited cocaine craving. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93(21):12040-12045. FREE FULL TEXT
73. Wang GJ, Volkow ND, Fowler JS, Cervany P, Hitzemann RJ, Pappas NR, Wong CT, Felder C. Regional brain metabolic activation during craving elicited by recall of previous drug experiences. Life Sci. 1999;64(9):775-784. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
74. Schneider F, Habel U, Wagner M, Franke P, Salloum JB, Shah NJ, Toni I, Sulzbach C, Hönig K, Maier W, Gaebel W, Zilles K. Subcortical correlates of craving in recently abstinent alcoholic patients. Am J Psychiatry. 2001;158(7):1075-1083. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
75. Hester R, Garavan H. Executive dysfunction in cocaine addiction: evidence for discordant frontal, cingulate, and cerebellar activity. J Neurosci. 2004;24(49):11017-11022. FREE FULL TEXT
76. Jackson KJ, Martin BR, Changeux JP, Damaj MI. Differential role of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunits in physical and affective nicotine withdrawal signs. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2008;325(1):302-312. FREE FULL TEXT
77. Mitsis EM, Cosgrove KP, Staley JK, Bois F, Frohlich EB, Tamagnan GD, Estok KM, Seibyl JP, van Dyck CH. Age-related decline in nicotinic receptor availability with [(123)I]5-IA-85380 SPECT [published online January 31, 2008]. Neurobiol Aging. doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2007.12.008. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
78. Mukhin AG, Kimes AS, Chefer SI, Matochik JA, Contoreggi CS, Horti AG, Vaupel DB, Pavlova O, Stein EA. Greater nicotinic acetylcholine receptor density in smokers than in nonsmokers: a PET study with 2-18F-FA-85380. J Nucl Med. 2008;49(10):1628-1635. FREE FULL TEXT
79. Pauly JR, Marks MJ, Gross SD, Collins AC. An autoradiographic analysis of cholinergic receptors in mouse brain after chronic nicotine treatment. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1991;258(3):1127-1136. FREE FULL TEXT
80. Marks MJ, Stitzel JA, Collins AC. Time course study of the effects of chronic nicotine infusion on drug response and brain receptors. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1985;235(3):619-628. FREE FULL TEXT
81. Ksir C, Hakan R, Hall DP Jr, Kellar KJ. Exposure to nicotine enhances the behavioral stimulant effect of nicotine and increases binding of [3H]-acetylcholine to nicotinic receptors. Neuropharmacology. 1985;24(6):527-531. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
82. Hughes JR. Effects of abstinence from tobacco: valid symptoms and time course. Nicotine Tob Res. 2007;9(3):315-327. ABSTRACT
83. Walters CL, Brown S, Changeux JP, Martin B, Damaj MI. The β2 but not α7 subunit of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor is required for nicotine-conditioned place preference in mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2006;184(3-4):339-344. FULL TEXT | PUBMED
84. Lai A, Parameswaran N, Khwaja M, Whiteaker P, Lindstrom JM, Fan H, McIntosh JM, Grady SR, Quik M. Long-term nicotine treatment decreases striatal α6* nicotinic acetylcholine receptor sites and function in mice. Mol Pharmacol. 2005;67(5):1639-1647. FREE FULL TEXT
85. McCallum SE, Parameswaran N, Bordia T, Fan H, McIntosh JM, Quik M. Differential regulation of mesolimbic α3*/α6β2* and α4β2* nicotinic acetylcholine receptor sites and function after long-term oral nicotine to monkeys. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2006;318(1):381-388. FREE FULL TEXT
86. McCallum SE, Parameswaran N, Bordia T, Fan H, Tyndale RF, Langston JW, McIntosh JM, Quik M. Increases in α4* but not α3*/α6* nicotinic receptor sites and function in the primate striatum following chronic oral nicotine treatment. J Neurochem. 2006;96(4):1028-1041. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
87. Perez XA, Bordia T, McIntosh JM, Grady SR, Quik M. Long-term nicotine treatment differentially regulates striatal α6α4β2* and α6(nonα4)β2* nAChR expression and function. Mol Pharmacol. 2008;74(3):844-853. FREE FULL TEXT
88. Cui C, Booker TK, Allen RS, Grady SR, Whiteaker P, Marks MJ, Salminen O, Tritto T, Butt CM, Allen WR, Stitzel JA, McIntosh JM, Boulter J, Collins AC, Heinemann SF. The β3 nicotinic receptor subunit: a component of α-conotoxin MII-binding nicotinic acetylcholine receptors that modulate dopamine release and related behaviors. J Neurosci. 2003;23(35):11045-11053. FREE FULL TEXT
89. Besson M, Granon S, Mameli-Engvall M, Cloëz-Tayarani I, Maubourguet N, Cormier A, Cazala P, David V, Changeux JP, Faure P. Long-term effects of chronic nicotine exposure on brain nicotinic receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(19):8155-8160. FREE FULL TEXT


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

This Month in Archives of General Psychiatry
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009;66(6):579.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Effect of Secondhand Smoke on Occupancy of Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors in Brain
Brody et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 2011;68:953-960.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Selegiline Transdermal System (STS) as an Aid for Smoking Cessation
Kahn et al.
Nicotine Tob Res 2011;0:ntr143v1-ntr143.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Monoamine Oxidase A Binding in the Prefrontal and Anterior Cingulate Cortices During Acute Withdrawal From Heavy Cigarette Smoking
Bacher et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 2011;68:817-826.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Parallel Anxiolytic-Like Effects and Upregulation of Neuronal Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Following Chronic Nicotine and Varenicline
Turner et al.
Nicotine Tob Res 2011;13:41-46.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Quantification of Smoking-Induced Occupancy of {beta}2-Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors: Estimation of Nondisplaceable Binding
Esterlis et al.
JNM 2010;51:1226-1233.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Beta2* nicotinic acetylcholine receptors modulate pain sensitivity in acutely abstinent tobacco smokers
Cosgrove et al.
Nicotine Tob Res 2010;12:535-539.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Craving among long-abstinent smokers: An Internet survey
Hughes
Nicotine Tob Res 2010;12:459-462.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.