This Article  • PDF of this Correction  • Original article  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • HIV/AIDS  • Randomized Controlled Trial  • Infectious Diseases  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999;56:693.

In the original article by Goodkin et al titled "A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of a Bereavement Support Group Intervention in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1–Seropositive and –Seronegative Homosexual Men," published in the January issue of the ARCHIVES (1999;56:52-59), an error occurred in Table 1 on page 55. The "Unemployed, %" variable refers only to the previous week, and the entries should have read: "for the randomized sample, 12.2%; for the total efficacy sample, 12.1%; for the HIV-1–seropositive subsample, 12.4%; and for the HIV-1–seronegative subsample, 11.6%; P=.88." However, a more representative employment statistic would have been "Employed, full-time or part-time (past year), %." Therefore, the last row should have read as follows: "Employed (full-time or part-time, past year), %: for the randomized sample, 66.5%; for the total efficacy sample, 65.1%; for the HIV-1–seropositive subsample, 57.7%; and for the HIV-1–seronegative subsample, 75.4%; P.02." These corrected data support the statement made in the first footnote that the HIV-1–seropositive subsample was less frequently employed (as well as less well educated, less frequently European American, and younger).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Predictors of efficacy in depression prevention programmes: Meta-analysis
JANE-LLOPIS et al.
Br. J. Psychiatry 2003;183:384-397.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT