 |
 |

A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial of 5 Smoking Cessation Pharmacotherapies
Megan E. Piper, PhD;
Stevens S. Smith, PhD;
Tanya R. Schlam, PhD;
Michael C. Fiore, MD, PhD;
Douglas E. Jorenby, PhD;
David Fraser, MS;
Timothy B. Baker, PhD
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009;66(11):1253-1262.
Context Little direct evidence exists on the relative efficacies of different smoking cessation pharmacotherapies, yet such evidence is needed to make informed decisions about their clinical use.
Objective To assess the relative efficacies of 5 smoking cessation pharmacotherapy interventions using placebo-controlled, head-to-head comparisons.
Design A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.
Setting Two urban research sites.
Patients One thousand five hundred four adults who smoked at least 10 cigarettes per day during the past 6 months and reported being motivated to quit smoking. Participants were excluded if they reported using any form of tobacco other than cigarettes; current use of bupropion; having a current psychosis or schizophrenia diagnosis; or having medical contraindications for any of the study medications.
Interventions Participants were randomized to 1 of 6 treatment conditions: nicotine lozenge, nicotine patch, sustained-release bupropion, nicotine patch plus nicotine lozenge, bupropion plus nicotine lozenge, or placebo. In addition, all participants received 6 individual counseling sessions.
Main Outcome Measures Biochemically confirmed 7-day point-prevalence abstinence assessed at 1 week after the quit date (postquit), end of treatment (8 weeks postquit), and 6 months postquit. Other outcomes were initial cessation, number of days to lapse, number of days to relapse, and latency to relapse after the first lapse.
Results All pharmacotherapies differed from placebo when examined without protection for multiple comparisons (odds ratios, 1.63-2.34). With such protection, only the nicotine patch plus nicotine lozenge (odds ratio, 2.34, P < .001) produced significantly higher abstinence rates at 6-month postquit than did placebo.
Conclusion While the nicotine lozenge, bupropion, and bupropion plus lozenge produced effects that were comparable with those reported in previous research, the nicotine patch plus lozenge produced the greatest benefit relative to placebo for smoking cessation.
Author Affiliations: Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention (Drs Piper, Smith, Schlam, Fiore, Jorenby, and Baker and Mr Fraser), and Department of Medicine (Drs Smith, Fiore, Jorenby, and Baker), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison.
CiteULike Connotea Delicious Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLE
This Month in Archives of General Psychiatry
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009;66(11):1158.
FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
 |
Should All Smokers Use Combination Smoking Cessation Pharmacotherapy? Using Novel Analytic Methods to Detect Differential Treatment Effects Over 8 Weeks of Pharmacotherapy
Loh et al.
Nicotine Tob Res 2012;14:131-141.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Monoamine Oxidase A Binding in the Prefrontal and Anterior Cingulate Cortices During Acute Withdrawal From Heavy Cigarette Smoking
Bacher et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 2011;68:817-826.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Nicotine patch plus lozenge gives greatest increases in abstinence from smoking at 6 months compared with placebo; smaller effects seen with nicotine patch alone, bupropion or nicotine lozenges alone or combined
Buchanan
Evid. Based Nurs. 2011;13:50-51.
FULL TEXT
Nicotine patch plus lozenge gives greatest increases in abstinence from smoking rates at 6 months compared with placebo; smaller effects seen with nicotine patch alone, bupropion or nicotine lozenges alone or combined
Gonzales
Evid. Based Med. 2010;15:77-78.
FULL TEXT
Effects of Smoking and Smoking Cessation on Endothelial Function: 1-Year Outcomes From a Randomized Clinical Trial
Johnson et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:1988-1995.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Comparative Effectiveness of 5 Smoking Cessation Pharmacotherapies in Primary Care Clinics
Smith et al.
Arch Intern Med 2009;169:2148-2155.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|