This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (8)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

AVERY D. WEISMAN, M.D.

AMA Arch Gen Psychiatry 1959;1(3):288-309.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Bridging the gap between theory and practice is one of psychiatry’s most important tasks. Although theories abound, too often there is only meager evidence to support those theories. Paradoxically, the overwhelming material which some patients bring to an interview presents a serious problem for the psychiatrist, who must order the abundant, seemingly chaotic content into intelligible conceptual form. Moreover, in bringing clinical content into closer relationship with theoretical conclusions, the distinction between what the patient talks about and what the doctor infers is sometimes overlooked. It is possible to slip from cautious inductive reasoning to deduction from already established hypotheses, without recognizing that new factors have been introduced. The resulting confusion between theoretical conjecture and clinical facts has even prompted some psychiatrists to believe that they have made unique discoveries.

The current popularity of the tape-recorded interview is based on . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
Boston

From the Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, and the Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School.

Footnotes
Submitted for publication Nov. 13, 1958.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?