This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on Web of Science (6)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

J. G. THORPE, Ph.D.; A. A. BAKER, M.D.

AMA Arch Gen Psychiatry 1959;1(3):338-341.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

I. Introduction

During the past 20 years clinical trials have come into prominence and fashion both in general medicine and in psychiatry. In the latter, trials of tranquilizing drugs have stimulated the application of statistical techniques, and today most journals contain more than a fair share of mathematical analysis and evaluation. Indeed, one can wonder whether such an evaluation has not become the fig leaf of scientific respectability without which a relevant conclusion cannot be drawn. It is proposed in this paper to draw attention to some of the limitations of statistical evaluations as they appear in the literature, to examine the relation between science and statistics, and to examine the contribution of statistics in the field of psychiatry.

II. Limitations

The conclusions of clinical trials are usually presented as follows: "There is (or is not), a significant difference between treatments A and B for . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
Sutton, Surrey, England

Research Psychologist (Dr. Thorpe), and Deputy Physician Superintendent (Dr. Baker), Banstead Hospital.

Footnotes
Submitted for publication Dec. 1, 1958.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?