You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 11 No. 1, July 1964 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Symbol Formation: An Organismic-Development Approach to Language and the Expression of Thought.

By Heinz Werner, PhD, and Bernard Kaplan, PhD. Price, $11.95. Pp 530. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 605 Third Ave., New York, NY 10016, 1963.

E. Mansell Pattison, MD, Reviewer

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1964;11(1):99-100.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The study of language has fluctuated in emphasis between form and function. Advocates of form analysis, the older linguistic tradition, have held that meaning is determined primarily by words and syntax. Whereas advocates of function analysis, pyscholinguistics, contend that meaning is determined by the implications of the language. At issue is the means of language development, the nature of the symbols employed in language, and the relationship between speech and thought.

Werner and Kaplan present a theory of language development which contains a synthesis of language form and function, and report a body of systematic research, largely from the Clark University projects on human development and symbolic activities. However, the research data is primarily employed to illustrate the theoretical constructions of the authors.

The authors consider man as unique in possessing a basic desire to know his world, rather than merely reacting with or reacting to his world (p . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1964 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.