You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 11 No. 2, August 1964 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Critical Essays on Psychoanalysis.

Edited by Stanley Rachman, MA, PhD. Price, $7.50. Pp 284. The Macmillan Company, Pergamon Press, 60 Fifth Ave, New York, NY 10011, 1963.

LeRoy P. Levitt, MD, Reviewer

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1964;11(2):227-228.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Purporting to be a series of critical essays on psychoanalysis, this collection quickly deteriorates into another argumentum ad hominem, with Freud, as usual, being the object of necrophiliac sniping. Many of the contributors are well known for their chronic vendettas against psychoanalysis, and in so doing, expose the pedestrian nature of somewhat collegiate resistances. The time-worn outcries, the dissillusioned hopes, and the polemical obsessionalism with psychoanalytical concepts are at least clearly stated.

Mr. Rachman's introduction, for example, states that, "Psychoanalysis...has managed to continue for a half of century without being noticeably influenced by the findings of conventional or academic psychology ..." It is inconceivable that even in the presence of such massive denial that the works of the late David Rapaport, the Hartmann-Kris-Lowenstein papers, or Waelder's book on theory could be ignored. Such distorted damnations continue with the expected begrudging praise of Freud at the end to . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1964 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.