You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 11 No. 3, September 1964 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Study in Psychophysiology of Muscle Tension

I. Response Specificity

IRIS BALSHAN GOLDSTEIN, PhD; ROY R. GRINKER, SR., MD; HELEN A. HEATH, PhD; DONALD OKEN, MD; WILLIAM G. SHIPMAN, PhD

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1964;11(3):322-330.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

It has been generally assumed that psychosomatic disorders result from a heightened state of reactivity or chronic excitation of a definite organ system, particularly in response to appropriate psychological stressors. Malmo and Shagass9 provided confirmatory evidence for this view by demonstrating that individuals with psychosomatic symptoms manifest heightened stress responsivity in the relevant physiological system. This phenomenon they termed "symptom specificity." Patients with cardiovascular symptoms exhibited greater heart rate, heart rate varia bility, and respiratory variability than individuals without such symptoms. In comparison, those with head and neck complaints were characterized by abnormally high muscle action potentials in the corresponding areas. Unanswered by this study was the question whether the heightened reactivity might not be a consequence of the state of abnormality.

Lacey and his co-workers7,8 carried out a series of studies which indicated that a wide variety of subjects without psychosomatic . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

CHICAGO

Institute for Psychosomatic and Psychiatric Research and Training, Michael Reese Hospital and Medical Center.


Footnotes

Submitted for publication March 2, 1964.

This investigation was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health Grant M-5519 and by the State of Illinois Mental Health Fund 1711.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1964 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.