You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 11 No. 3, September 1964 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Revolution in Psychiatry.

By Ernest Becker, PhD. Price, $5.50. Pp 276. The Free Press of Glencoe, 60 Fifth Ave, New York, NY 10011, 1964.

Roy R. Grinker, Sr., MD, Reviewer

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1964;11(3):346-348.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The author holds a doctorate in anthropology, which presumably constitutes one of the social sciences. Anthropology has laboriously cultivated its own theories and developed its own operational methods for the observations of "natural" societies and has devised its experimental methods for the study of changing cultures. The author, however, does not reveal a commitment to his scientific discipline, loudly decrying all "scientism."

For some years he has been associated with Thomas Szasz at Syracuse University in the department of psychiatry, and his discernible attitudes are quite similar to those of his mentor. By this I mean a destructive critical iconoclasm presented in broad generalities, in sentence following sentence containing unproven declarations, in false quotations often taken out of context, and in a striking unfamiliarity with the empirical data which he lightly dismisses and for which he substitutes his own armchair thinking. Whereas Szasz attempted to destroy concepts of . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1964 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.