You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 12 No. 1, January 1965 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (71)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Evoked Responses and Segmental Set of Schizophrenia

ENOCH CALLAWAY III, MD; REESE T. JONES, MD; ROBERT S. LAYNE, AB

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1965;12(1):83-89.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

This report describes the use of the averaged auditory evoked response to explore a particular psychological theory of schizophrenia. Specifically, the differences in electroencephalographic responses evoked by two trivially different tones are used to assess degree of preoccupation with ordinarily disregarded details of existence.

When a stimulus is presented to a subject, an electrical potential change can be detected at the top of the head. This is illustrated in Fig 1.

At the top of the figure are averaged responses evoked by two physically different tones—a tone of 600 cycles and a tone of 1,000 cycles. Although the tones are physically different, the forms of the evoked responses are almost identical. Before this pair of evoked responses were recorded, the subject was told to ignore the tones. Later, the subject could not recall having made any particular distinction between the high . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

SAN FRANCISCO

From the Langley Porter Neuropsychiatric Institute, California Department of Mental Hygiene and the University of California School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry.

Chief of Research, Langley Porter Neuropsychiatric Institute, Associate Clinical Professor University of California, School of Medicine (Dr. Callaway); Psychiatric Resident, University of California, School of Medicine (Dr. Jones); and Medical student, University of California, School of Medicine (Mr. Layne).


Footnotes

Read before the 120th Annual Meeting of the American Psychiatric Association, May 4-8, 1964, Los Angeles.

This work was supported by the Office of Naval Research Contract NONR 2931 (00); and by Project 62-1-32 from the California Department of Mental Hygiene.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1965 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.