You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 12 No. 3, March 1965 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Syndromes of Psychosis.

By Maurice Lorr, C. James Klett, and Douglas M. McNair. Price, $10. Pp 286. Pergamon Press Book, The Macmillan Company, 60 Fifth Ave, New York 10011, 1963.

Beatrice Werble, PhD, Reviewer

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1965;12(3):326-327.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The variety of studies reported in this monograph originated with the purpose of assessing the effects of drugs on hospitalized psychotics. Later the goal was vastly enlarged to establishing an objective taxonomy for the so-called behavior disorders through the isolation of major psychotic syndromes and types. The authors present evidence for ten statistically derived psychiatric syndromes, six psychotic types or classes, and two theoretical models for the organization of the syndromes.

The guiding presupposition underlying this work is that an objective taxonomy and nomenclature is an important, if not necessary, first step for the study of the behavior disorders. American psychiatry, the authors claim, takes the attitude that formal diagnosis is "sterile, undynamic and unimportant." But paradoxically, psychiatric diagnoses are still widely used for administrative, therapeutic, and research purposes.

The present nomenclature is unreliable, lacks the power to classify a large number of cases, lacks predictive utility, and . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1965 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.