 |
 |

On Being Serious
HAROLD A. RASHKIS, MD
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1965;12(5):520-523.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
Life is real! Life is earnest! And the grave is not its goal. . .
—Longfellow
I
PRESUMABLY there is an optimum level of seriousness* on which one should deal with life. To be a jester arouses the suspicion that one is avoiding the consequences of his intended behavior or, worse, that he is attempting to ensnare others into playing his little game.2 To be optimistic suggests that one's superego is unrealistically friendly and protective; pessimism, on the other hand, alerts to oral deprivation.1 Certainly one should be realistic, and certainly life is in reality no overall laughing matter; yet we are made uneasy by "yon Cassius" with his "lean and hungry look," we reject Milton's "Il Penseroso" as possibly dyspeptic, and we may not linger overly long before Rodin's "Thinker." Excessive seriousness is not attractive to the healthy adult.
Yet some people seem to
. . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]
Author Affiliations
PHILADELPHIA
From the Department of Clinical Research, Eastern Pennsylvania Psychiatric Institute, and Department of Psychiatry, Woman's Medical College of Pennsylvania.
Footnotes
Submitted for publication Dec 4, 1964.
Reprint requests to Henry Ave and Abbottsford Rd, Philadelphia, Pa 19129.
The pertinent definitions of serious, adjective, in Webster's Third New International Dictionary of the English Language, unabridged, Springfield, Mass: G. & C. Merriam Co., 1963, are: (1) grave in disposition, appearance, or manner: not light, not gay, nor volatile. (3a) being in earnest: not jesting, trifling, or deceiving.
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
|