You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 14 No. 3, March 1966 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Therapist's Contribution to the Treatment Process.

By Hugh Mullan, MD, and Iris Sangiuliano, PhD. Price, $8.50. Pp 280. Charles C Thomas, Publisher, 301-327 E Lawrence Ave, Springfield, Ill 62703, 1964.

Daniel Offer, MD, Reviewer

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1966;14(3):327.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The purpose of this book is, as the authors state in the preface, "to redefine the psychotherapist, his function and his commitment in light of the immediate concerns of our generation." Further, in the preface Drs. Mullan and Sangiuliano write, "Systems of therapy, by their very nature, either implicitly or explicity rigidly characterize what is patient and what is therapist. This delineation is harmful to the therapeutic situation in that it establishes roles that the participants must play and limits their participation to certain prescribed procedures. In order for the two transactors to be together in a manner conducive to change, these restricting designations and the behavior they demand must be superceded. Each must become more than just patient or therapist with the other" (author's italics). The rest of the book is devoted to convincing the bewildered reader that they indeed meant what they said in the preface.

The authors' . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1966 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.