You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 14 No. 3, March 1966 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Use of Written Communications in Psychotherapy.

By Leonard Pearson, PhD. Price, $4.50. Pp 65. Charles C Thomas, Publisher, 301-327 E Lawrence Ave, Springfield, Ill 62703, 1965.

F. Theodore Reid, Jr., MD, Reviewer

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1966;14(3):328-329.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

This volume is composed of papers delivered by their authors at a symposium of the American Psychological Association, now somewhat revised and presented for a wider professional audience. Each author from his own experience and theoretical point of view presents his rationale for using other than oral communication as a basis for psychotherapeutic effort. The results for this reviewer were mixed and overlapping. This creates a need for discussion of the book in general, as well as the individual papers.

In a sense, the whole volume is a tribute to the quiet pragmatism which has been felt in the psychological healing arts for the past 25 years. The prospect or possibility of respected and respectable members of the psychological community seriously suggesting other than oral therapeutic intervention at some earlier date seems inconceivable. In this sense, this volume ranks along with other more familiar and more dramatic . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1966 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.