You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 14 No. 4, April 1966 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Psychiatric Ideologies and Institutions.

By Anselm Strauss, PhD, Leonard Schatzman, PhD, Rue Bucher, PhD, Danuta Ehrlich, PhD, and Melvin Sabshin, MD. Price, $8.50. Pp 412. Free Press of Glencoe, a division of the Macmillan Co., 60 Fifth Ave, New York 10011, 1964.

Alfred H. Stanton, Reviewer

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1966;14(4):442-443.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

This is the first serious and informed study of the implications of the functioning of the psychiatric hospital for psychiatric theory. The investigators have taken strategic advantage of a chance to study two widely different hospitals and three services of different ideology and practice in the larger hospital. The work is a collaborative one conducted with full knowledge of modern dynamic psychiatry and of ways of studying the institutional context. While the sociology of knowledge—the placing of human thought and understanding in its historical and social context—would seem to require that the investigators be in possession of all the knowledge they make the object of their study, in fact this can be handled either by dealing only with certain issues which repetitively arise and form a nucleus of attention or by dealing only with attitudes toward theory rather than the theoretical developments themselves. The authors have . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1966 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.