You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 17 No. 2, August 1967 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (75)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Prediction of Improvement in Group Therapy

An Exploratory Study

Irvin D. Yalom, MD; Peter S. Houts, PhD; Sheldon M. Zimerberg, AB; Kenneth H. Rand, AB

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1967;17(2):159-168.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

TIME and again group therapy outcome has proven to be a quagmire for clinical researchers. Reviews of evaluation studies have served primarily to underscore the pitfalls involved, which include not only all those encountered in individual therapy evaluation but several idiosyncratic to group therapy.1-3 Satisfactory outcome measures have not been developed; numerous studies have indicated that many prepost psychometric tests, of value in individual therapy outcome studies, do not accurately reflect the changes undergone by group therapy patients.4,5 Often improvement in the group (group maturation, increased cohesiveness) or improvement of the patient's group behavior has been erroneously equated with patient improvement.6 Clinical studies in which the group therapist evaluates the outcome of his own patients suffer from observer bias.

Another obstacle is the high attrition rate in group therapy, which has forced many investigators into the untenable position of conducting short-term follow-up . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Palo Alto, Calif

From the Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, Calif.


Footnotes

Submitted for publication March 10, 1967.

Reprint requests to the Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford Medical Center, Palo Alto, Calif 94304 (Dr. Yalom).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1967 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.