You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 2 No. 2, February 1960 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (16)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Measurement of Outcome in Psychotherapy

A Study in Method

HUGH A. STORROW, M.D.

AMA Arch Gen Psychiatry 1960;2(2):142-146.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

This paper describes the derivation of a simple measure of therapeutic outcome which can be used routinely in a psychiatric unit. A number of workers have discussed the many problems which confront the investigator in this area.1,3,10,11 Of the possible approaches to such measurement, rating methods are perhaps the most commonly used.4,5,8,9,12,14

Method

Subjects.—The subjects were all adults treated between Oct. 1, 1957, and June 30, 1958, at either the inpatient or the outpatient unit of the Department of Psychiatry, University of California Medical Center, Los Angeles. All the necessary data were available for 45 such patients, and they constitute the sample. Seventy-six per cent of this group were women. Three-fourths of the subjects were between 20 and 39 years old, although the total age range was 18 through 55. In 49% the disorders were diagnosed as psychoneurotic disorders, in 29% as personality disorders,and in 4% as psychotic disorders. The remaining patients were distributed among the other diagnostic classifications. . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Los Angeles

Assistant Professor of Psychiatry, University of California at Los Angeles School of Medicine.


Footnotes

Submitted for publication June 25, 1959.

Paper presented at the 115th Annual Meeting of the American Psychiatric Association, Philadelphia, April 27, 1959.

Norman Q. Brill, M.D., was of great help in the formulation of these scales.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1960 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.