You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 2 No. 6, June 1960 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Annual Survey of Psychoanalysis, 1954:

A Comprehensive Survey of Current Psychoanalytic Theory and Practice. Edited by John Frosch, M.D., and Nathaniel Ross. M.D. Price, $12.00. Pp. 608. International Universities Press, Inc., 227 W. 13th St., New York 11, 1959.

Roy R. Grinker, M.D., Reviewer

AMA Arch Gen Psychiatry 1960;2(6):713.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The survey for 1954 is again extremely late. A differential of five years is much too large for any survey or abstract book. The volume is somewhat smaller than its predecessors and also has more contributing editors, so that future editions should really be published sooner after the year surveyed has been completed.

The major criticism of the survey is the length of each of the so-called abstracts. Too much detail is included, and much of it is unnecessary for the reader to get the gist of the paper. The analytic papers themselves are so filled with details, and often extraneous discussions, that one would expect from a survey a contrary succinctness and brevity.

In the second place, the survey contains repetitive material. Articles are abstracted and books are mentioned in several sections by different members of the editorial staff. This repetitiveness is not helpful, even though there may . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1960 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.