This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on Web of Science (16)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Milton Kramer, MD

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1970;22(2):149-159.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

WHETHER viewed as a source of divine revelation,¹ as a portent of things to come,² or as a route to gain insights into the soul of the dreamer,³ the dream has been an object of interest and concern for men throughout recorded history.⁴ In our own era, the interest in dreams has been kept alive by two groups, the depth psychologists⁵ and the man in the street. The so-called "hard" scientists who deal with human behavior have eschewed an interest in dreams as they have in most, if not all, of the subjective aspects of behavior.

It is to Freud⁶ and Jung⁷ and to their adherents^5,8 that the credit must go for maintaining modern psychology's interest in the content of dreams. It is their persistent commitment to the dream as the psychic product par excellence for gaining an under . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
Cincinnati

From the Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, and the Psychiatric Service, Cincinnati Veterans Administration Hospital.

Footnotes
Submitted for publication July 7, 1969.

Read before the 23rd Annual Meeting of the Society of Biological Psychiatry, Washington, DC, June 14-16, 1968.

Reprint requests to Psychiatric Service, Cincinnati Veterans Administration Hospital, 3200 Vine St, Cincinnati 45220.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?