This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (69)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Epidemiological Implications of a Hypothesis

Robert E. Kendell, MD, MRCP, DPM

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1970;22(4):308-318.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

THE idea that aggression plays a fundamental role in the development of depression is woven into the fabric of psychiatric thinking. It is half a century since Abraham and Freud first suggested that depression was caused by the introjection of aggressive impulses that had originally been directed externally,^1,2 and in spite of the dissenting opinions of Balint,³ Bibring,⁴ and others, their views are still widely accepted. But Abraham and Freud's hypothesis has a fatal flaw. Like psychoanalytic theory in general, it is formulated in intrapsychic terms. Observable change in the patient's mood or behavior are attributed to intrapsychic events which cannot be observed, only inferred on the basis of the same behavioral changes that they were adduced to explain. As a result, it is incapable of being either confirmed or refuted; after 50 years, there is still no evidence for it or . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
London

From the University of Vermont, College of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Burlington, Vt. Dr. Kendell is currently at the Institute of Psychiatry, the Maudsley Hospital, London.

Footnotes
Submitted for publication Aug 15, 1969.

Reprint requests to the Institute of Psychiatry, The Maudsley Hospital, London, SE 5 (Dr. Kendell).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?