 |
|
Alternatives to the Suicide Prevention Approach to Mental Health
John Hitchcock, MD;
Jack A. Wolford, MD
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1970;22(6):547-549.
|
|
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings. |
|
|
|
SUICIDE prevention facilities are appearing at a rapid rate in the United States—from 47 to 74 in less than a year.1
The purposes of this communication are to raise certain issues which we believe expose some of the theoretical and practical deficiencies in the suicide prevention service, and to suggest alternatives.
Review of the literature fails to reveal any indication that persons harboring self-destructive impulses share with each other any attribute other than the self-destructive impulse itself. Types of behavior described as "self-destructive" are diverse and range from the successful suicidal act to "accidents," and "chronic" suicidal conditions such as alcoholism, obesity, smoking, and even work or school performance.
A number of authors point out that individuals manifesting suicidal behavior show no significant concordance for genic material, personality or character structure, psychiatric diagnosis, socioeconomic status, life situation, age, or any other defined parameter. Litman says suicide is "an
. . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]
Author Affiliations
Pittsburgh
From the Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic Community Study Center (Dr. Hitchcock), and the Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic Community Mental Health Center (Dr. Wolford), the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh.
Footnotes
Submitted for publication Oct 16, 1969.
Reprint requests to Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 3811 O'Hara St, Pittsburgh 15213 (Dr. Hitchcock).
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter
What's this?
|
