You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 23 No. 5, November 1970 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (38)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

EEG-Averaged Evoked Response and Perceptual Variability in Schizophrenics

Lawrence B. Inderbitzin, MD; Monte Buchsbaum, MD; Julian Silverman, PhD

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1970;23(5):438-444.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

PERCEPTUAL and cognitive studies of schizophrenic patients characteristically reveal great variability. Not only does the performance of schizophrenics on psychological tests typically cover a much broader response range than that of nonschizophrenics, but individual performance shows great variability across time.1 By selecting representatives of two schizophrenic subtypes as subjects for this study, we hoped to reduce interindividual variability, thus enabling ourselves to observe intraindividual variability more clearly. The two subtypes, nonparanoid long-term process and paranoid short-term reactive, have clinical characteristics often thought to be consistently associated with markedly different perceptual behavior patterns.1 To test the hypothesis that the two groups show contrasting perceptual patterns, two psychophysical tasks and an average evoked response (AER) measure were administered.

In previous researches, a correlation was demonstrated in normal waking-state subjects between reponsiveness on a kinesthetic figural aftereffects (KFA) procedure and responsiveness on an AER . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Washington DC; Bethesda, Md; San Jose, Calif

From the Laboratory of Clinical Psychopharmacology, Division of Special Mental Health Research, IR National Institute of Mental Health, St. Elizabeth's Hospital, Washington DC (Dr. Inderbitzin); the Laboratory of Psychology, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Md (Dr. Buchsbaum); and Agnews State Hospital, San Jose, Calif (Dr. Silverman).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication March 17, 1970.

Reprint requests to Laboratory of Clinical Psychopharmacology, Division of Special Mental Health Research, Ir, National Institute of Mental Health, St. Elizabeth's Hospital, Washingotn DC 20032 (Dr. Inderbitzin).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1970 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.