This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Bruce P. Dohrenwend, PhD; Thomas J. Yager, PhD; Gladys Egri, MD; Frederick S. Mendelsohn, MD
Social Psychiatry Research Unit Columbia University 100 Haven Ave New York, NY 10032

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1980;37(6):720-721.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.—

Spitzer et al1 have criticized our article² about the Psychiatric Status Schedule (PSS) on the grounds that we were confused about the appropriate criteria with which to evaluate its adequacy for the purposes of epidemiologic research. More specifically, they argue that our reliance on internal consistency reliability was misplaced since low internal consistency is an underestimate of true reliability and therefore does not necessarily invalidate the PSS scales. Spitzer and his colleagues believe that the PSS can be used validly in the general population for "case finding," a term we will attempt to clarify before addressing their major criticism.

Uses of the PSS.—

The PSS contains nearly 500 items. Scoring these items requires a considerable amount of prior clinical sophistication. It was never our intention to use such a demanding instrument for the purpose of differentiating "cases" from "noncases," regardless of diagnostic types. There are a . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?