This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Jean Endicott, PhD
Research Assessment and Training Unit New York State Psychiatric Institute 722 W 168th St New York, NY 10032

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1981;38(11):1300.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.—

The National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS) was described by Robins et al in the April 1981 issue of the ARCHIVES (1981;38:381-389). The DIS was designed for use by lay interviewers. Computer programs have been developed to classify subjects diagnostically. The computer rules are based on three sets of criteria (DSM-III, Feighner criteria, and Research Diagnostic Criteria [RDC]). I am fully sympathetic to the need for a procedure suitable for use in large-scale epidemiological studies that will yield indexes of different types and severities of mental disorder rather than simple frequencies of symptoms or levels of impairment. However, I have serious reservations about the ability of the DIS to produce computerized diagnoses that will be equivalent to diagnoses made by clinicians using the RDC or DSM-III criteria as they originally were designed to be used.

The article refers to evidence of the validity of . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?