You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 39 No. 10, October 1982 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Dexamethasone Suppression Test: Technique and Accuracy

Victor S. Fang, PhD
Departments of Medicine and Psychiatry

Barbara Warenica, MD
Department of Medicine

Herbert Y. Meltzer, MD
Department of Psychiatry Pritzker School of Medicine University of Chicago 950 E 59th St Chicago, IL 60637

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1982;39(10):1217.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.

—The dexamethasone suppression test (DST) is of great current interest in psychiatry because of the large body of evidence that some depressed patients fail to suppress cortisol levels to 5 µg/dL or less after an oral dose of 1.0 mg of dexamethasone.1 Many psychiatrists have adopted this procedure as the first laboratory test of significance for clinical practice. Carroll et al pointed out a number of pitfalls in applying this test.1 We wish to call attention to the need to assess rigorously the method of cortisol determination used by the clinical laboratories that carry out the test. Routine application of the 5-µg/dL cutoff could lead to a number of false-positive results, based on the results to be described.

Research laboratories, eg, those of Carroll, Sachar, and ourselves, use the competitive protein-binding assay (CPBA) method to measure plasma cortisol levels, whereas most clinical laboratories use commercial radioimmunoassay (RIA)kits. . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1982 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.