You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 4 No. 2, February 1961 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (9)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

A Criticism of Drug Therapy in Psychiatry

ROBERT LIBERMAN, A.B.

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961;4(2):131-136.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Pharmacological agents for the treatment of mental illness are coming into increasingly widespread use. Tranquilizers and psychic energizers have stimulated research into neurochemistry and have brought about the formulation of chemical hypotheses that attempts to explain the development of mental disease. The vast advertising campaigns undertaken by the drug companies in order to sell their psychotropic drugs, as well as the emergence of psychopharmacology as a subdiscipline in medical science, emphasize the attention being given currently to these agents.

At the same time that acceptance of these substances has become generalized, there has been little evaluation of their efficacy. It is as though these compounds have been established, a priori, as possessing therapeutic action. This paper will study the reported effects of the group of drugs classified as "psychic energizers" and will challenge the widely held notion that they are powerful therapeutic tools.

Despite the great . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

SAN FRANCISCO

University of California School of Medicine.


Footnotes

Submitted for publication Aug. 3, 1960.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1961 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.