This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Scott D. Jones, MD
St Louis University School of Medicine St Louis, MO 63103

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1983;40(1):107.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.—

Dr Chessick's case report of the intensive and lengthy treatment of a patient with borderline personality (ARCHIVES 1982;39:413-419) highlights an important fact about the diagnosis and treatment of this disorder, and also merits comment.

First, although DSM-III represents a major advance over previous editions, this patient did not initially have symptoms that suggested a borderline disorder, as defined in it.¹ Thus, an unwary psychotherapist or analyst may well have been misled; indeed, several apparently were, according to Dr Chessick's report. The degree of this patient's disturbance became apparent only after intensive evaluation and treatment. This highlights the importance of not relying solely on a set of diagnostic criteria in DSM-III (however important) when evaluating the conditions of patients who might have preoedipal conflicts for intensive psychotherapy. The unfolding of the transference relationship seemed to be the real key to making the diagnosis. This patient, though clearly . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?