This Article  • Full text PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

David J. Kupfer, MD
Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic University of Pittsburgh 3811 O'Hara St Pittsburgh, PA 15213

A. John Rush, MD
Department of Psychiatry Southwestern Medical School Dallas, TX 75235

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1983;40(9):1031.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To Our Readers

The ARCHIVESeditorial office is moving Oct 1.

Please address all future correspondence, including submitted manuscripts and LETTERS To THE EDITOR, to Daniel X. Freedman, MD, Archives of General Psychiatry, UCLA Neuropsychiatric Institute, 760 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90024.

To the Editor.—

Recently, a group of clinical investigators attending an international conference on the origins of depression (Dahlem Conference, Berlin, November 1982) concluded that the majority of the scientific publications in peer-reviewed journals dealing with biologic factors in depression lacked a sufficient amount of essential information for other investigators or the general reader. While journals cannot reproduce all the raw data, a number of recommendations to editors, reviewers, and investigators were made by this group in the spirit of scientific advancement. Such recommendations for essential information were not meant to be interpreted as comments on research design or interpretation.

The group developed a consensus with regard . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?