This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

John G. Cull, PhD
Suite 260, Summit Tower 5835 Callaghan Rd San Antonio, TX 78228

Gale H. Rom, PhD
12031 Wilshire Blvd Los Angeles, CA 90025 Sister Suzanne Dancer 2026 Guadalupe Austin, TX 78705

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1984;41(3):309.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.—

Following are comments on Pokorny's report on prediction of suicide.¹ Although Pokorny is a distinguished researcher in this field, we believe there are some limitations to his method that give an overly pessimistic outlook on the possibilities of suicide prediction and prevention. Pokorny assumed suicide is undesirable and should be prevented. We do not, however, understand the relationship between these laudable assumptions and his study, nor the impact of these assumptions on his study.

Pokorny reviewed previous attempts to predict suicidal behavior. Yet the average age of his references was over 11 years and his most recent reference was three years old. Those three-year-old references contain nothing pertaining to the prediction of suicide, but merely identify groups that have committed suicide in Alberta and the United States. We suggest that Pokorny review some of the more recent attempts at assessment of suicidal risk.²

While Pokorny . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?