You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 41 No. 7, July 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  REGULAR DEPARTMENTS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Methodologie Differences in Major Depression and Panic Disorder Studies

James F. Leckman, MD; Myrna M. Weissman, PhD; athleen R. Merikangas, PhD
Department of Psychiatry

David L. Pauls, PhD
Child Study Center

Brigitte A. Prusoff, PhD
Department of Psychiatry Yale University School of Medicine New Haven, CT 06510

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1984;41(7):722-723.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.—

In the October 1983, issue of the ARCHIVES, several articles were published that directly or indirectly addressed the relationship between anxiety disorders and major depression. At first glance, the reports appear to be contradictory. The studies by Crowe et al and Harris et al (Iowa studies)12 found that major depression did not aggregate in the relatives of patients with panic as compared with control subjects. The study by Leckman et al (Yale study)3 found that major depression DID aggregate in the relatives of patients with major depression and panic disorder compared with normal control subjects and depressed patients without an anxiety disorder.

These discrepancies may be due to méthodologie, rather than real, differences. The méthodologie differences that stand out include the following.

1. The selection of probands included primary depressives in the Yale study, V patients with chronologically primary anxiety disorders in the Iowa studies. . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1984 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.