This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (1)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Richard Abrams, MD; Michael Alan Taylor, MD
University of Health Sciences/ The Chicago Medical School Department of Psychiatry 3333 Green Bay Rd North Chicago, IL 60064

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1985;42(4):422-423.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.—

McGuffin et al¹ used what they purported to be our criteria for schizophrenia and found them to be unreliable and "unsatisfactory for detecting the familiality of schizophrenia." Our response is as follows.

1. We substantially revised our criteria in 1978² by adding the requirements of first-rank symptoms and a clear consciousness to the inclusion criteria, and the presence of diagnosable affective disorder to the exclusion criteria, and by requiring the presence of only one (rather than all three) inclusion criterion for a diagnosis of schizophrenia. Nonetheless, McGuffin et al chose to use our 1975 criteria³; what was their rationale for doing so?

2. Our 1975 criteria were not accurately portrayed by McGuffin et al. We nowhere referred to "incoherent speech," but specified "blocking, nonsequiturs, neologisms, word approximations, and verbigeration" as the types of formal thought disorder required. A "restricted affect" alone could not satisfy our . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?