You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 42 No. 8, August 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  REGULAR DEPARTMENTS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Plasma Haloperidol Levels: Clinical Response and Fancy Mathematics-Reply

Robert C. Smith, MD, PhD
Biological Psychiatry Texas Research Institute of Mental Sciences 1300 Moursund Texas Medical Center Houston, TX 77030

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1985;42(8):835-838.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In Reply.—

The letter by Van Putten and colleagues has raised several in teresting questions. It also presents some interpretations of our data that were not stated, intended, or implied in our article.1 Before responding specifically to these questions, we wish to make corrections to our article that are warranted following our review of the procedures and data base.

First, there were several errors in the data entered into the computer data base utilized in the final statistical analysis. Subject 24 (Table 1 of the original article)2 had been dropped from the protocol because of a violation of protocol procedures. He was erroneously confused with another subject with a similar name and his data were mistakenly retained in the data base.

The mean plasma haloperidol levels of two other subjects (subjects 3 and 25) also were incorrectly computed. Subject 3 should have a haloperidol plasma level of 18.5 ng/mL (not . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1985 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.