This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Greer M. Murphy, Jr, PhD
Psychiatry Service Veterans Administration Medical Center 150 Muir Rd Martinez, CA 94553

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1987;44(2):195.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.—

Luborsky et al¹ reported in the ARCHIVES on the determinants of therapist success in treating a sample of opiate addicts. Their results are intriguing, but there are some methodologic and statistical problems that call their conclusions into question.

The authors state that their sample included 110 patients. However, the number of subjects falls to 78 in Table 1, 41 in Table 7, and 28 in Table 8. The excluded subjects may have had certain characteristics that promoted their departure, thus leaving a non-representative subsample. Further, selective subject loss from some therapist caseloads, but not from others, may have resulted in groups heterogeneous with respect to some unmeasured factor that influenced outcome. Thus, the observed intertherapist outcome differences may have been affected by factors unrelated to the treatment that the patients received.

The number of therapy sessions varied between three and 24 among patients. The differences among . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?