You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 47 No. 10, October 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Memory Improvement in Korsakoff's Disease With Fluvoxamine

William J. McEntee, MD
Memory Assessment Clinics Inc 1217 East Ave S Sarasota, FL 34239

Robert G. Mair, PhD
Psychology Department University of New Hampshire Durham, NH 03824

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1990;47(10):978.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.—

In the July 1989 issue of the ARCHIVES, Martin et al1 reported improvement of memory in patients with Korsakoff's psychosis (KP) by treatment with fluvoxamine maleate, a specific serotonin (5-HT) uptake inhibitor. This observation by itself is of interest, but the authors' interpretation of the data deserves comment.

Are data available showing the effects of fluvoxamine treatment on memory test performance and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) in normal persons?

The statistical analyses supporting the conclusions made for subjects with KP should be viewed with considerable caution. Three variables were analyzed: plasma levels of fluvoxamine, degree of improvement on tests of memory, and amount of reduction of CSF 5-HIAA. A total of 15 data points (5 for each variable) were reported; too few to provide a reliable multivariate analysis. Ideally, 20 data points per variable are needed for a sound multivariate analysis, and . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1990 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.